On Jul 9, 2013, at 1:01 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I hereby initiate the Agoran Decisions to select the holders of the
> offices of Ambassador-At-Large and Promotor. The vote collector is the
> IADoP; the eligible voters are the active first-class players.
>
> The candidates for Ambassador-At-Large ar
On Jul 9, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
>> The candidates for Promotor are omd and Machiavelli.
> I ENDORSE the current Promotor.
Perhaps it would be clearest to say "I ENDORSE the person who is Promotor as of
the time this vote is cast"? It's not clear that the phrase "the current
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
I hereby initiate the Agoran Decisions to select the holders of the
offices of Ambassador-At-Large and Promotor. The vote collector is the
IADoP; the eligible voters are the active first-class players.
The candidates for Ambassador-At-Large are Walker and Ro
> That's a shame, I didn't even get a chance to assign a case to you. =P
> ~ Roujo
I intend to stand if and only if you intend to assign me an easy case
and help me judge, because I don't know how any of this works. =D
The legal adequacy of this I will leave to actual players to determine; as
a kibitzer I merely wished to note that it is an artistic triumph. Bravo,
Fool!
On 10 July 2013 11:50, Fool wrote:
>
> HER FELINE MAJESTY DAVY I
> versus
> TANNER SWETT (aka MACHIAVELLI)
>
>
>
> Charles Walker on beh
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Fool wrote:
> This judgement takes effect immediately. Long live the Queen.
You have six more days. ;p
Arguments on CFJ 3357: although it appears that this case may have been judged
GUILTY, I can't figure out in any case what the sentence was.
Additional arguments on CFJ 3357: since I did not possess any VCs on May 18,
and I had no reasonable means of obtaining any in a timely fashion, it is not
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Fool wrote:
> I guess this is the Agoran version of "tits or GTFO"?
>
> Well I'm afraid this judg(e)ment cannot be appealed, check the rules.
>
Well I'm not sure that you made one at all, but that's because I
stopped reading after "HER"
-scshunt
On 09/07/2013 4:30 PM, omd wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:22 PM, omd wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
I vote for omd.
I vote for myself.
Campaign Speech:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxBW4mPzv6E
Look at this link, around 3:43. You'll see that the Best Party pro
There is, CFJ 3361, assigned to arkestra at the moment.
More info: http://cotc.psychose.ca/viewcase.php?cfj=3361
~ Roujo
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Is there already a CFJ on whether there's a 4-day wait for
> support actions in the Gerontocracy?
>
> R2357 doesn't ac
That's a shame, I didn't even get a chance to assign a case to you. =P
~ Roujo
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Lindar Greenwood
wrote:
> I lean.
Is there already a CFJ on whether there's a 4-day wait for
support actions in the Gerontocracy?
R2357 doesn't actually *say* that elder objections make it a w/o
objection dependent action with an associated 4-day wait, just that
if an intent happens to have enough elder objections, it fails.
Th
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Lindar Greenwood
wrote:
> I create a promise with the following text, where [N] is
> representative of the player cashing this promise:
You would have to put this condition into the text of the promise as
once created the promise is a text independent of the message
On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:08 PM, Lindar Greenwood wrote:
> The condition for cashing this promise is the following text, where
> [Q] is a player other than myself or the player cashing this promise
> and [N] is the player cashing this promise:
> { [Q] must exchange with me a majority of eir trading card
On 9 Jul 2013, at 22:08, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> On 9 Jul 2013, at 18:12, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> All office-holders are currently Independent.
>>
>> I CoE this.
>>
>> -- Walker
>
> Admitted.
>
> Why is this a part of my report.
No good re
On 8 Jul 2013, at 20:33, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I'm not going to get around to proposing infractions or
> ribbon changes anytime soon, if interested parties want
> to move ahead with that. -g.
Will be looking at doing these in a few weeks.
-- Walker
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Chuck Carroll wrote:
> A belated happy 20th birthday to Agora, and wishing you many more! And
> thanks to all the current Players for keeping Agora alive! Sorry I
> couldn’t send my wishes during the Birthday proper; I was travelling and
> had little ability to se
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Lindar Greenwood
wrote:
> I announce a CFJ on the following text:
> { Announcing in Agora-Business the creation of a promise that, upon
> being cashed, causes the player cashing said promise to break a rule,
> does not cause the creator of said promise to violate R
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:22 PM, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I vote for omd.
>
> I vote for myself.
Campaign Speech:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxBW4mPzv6E
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
> (Apologies for the lateness; I meant to do this earlier and got distracted.
> Incidentally,
> does anyone else think the salary rule is a little harsh?)
That's exactly why I resigned my offices last month, just the cost/benefit
analysis of
that, e
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
> >> I support. I object. (Always wanted to do that and have it be
> >> meaningful.)
> >
> > It's not though... you CANNOT wear two hats :-P
>
> Pfff. Loo
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
>> I support. I object. (Always wanted to do that and have it be
>> meaningful.)
>
> It's not though... you CANNOT wear two hats :-P
Pfff. Look, everyone, seems like G. is *poor* and *Irish*.
~ Roujo
On 9 Jul 2013 10:44, "Ørjan Johansen" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
>
>> I meant "buggy requirement" as a hypothetical in my quote (as in,
>> "satisfies the requirement if it's bugged").
>>
>> FWIW, I meant omd's interpretation when I wrote the rule originally. Not
>> that that
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Ribbon Holdings
>> ===
>
> ok, is this repealed, or isn't it. I've completely lost track.
>
>
>
Me too. I posted for safety's sake.
-scshunt
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 20:50 -0400, Fool wrote (about CFJ 3362):
> > Therefore I intend, with two support (and without five Elder objections)
> > to appeal. I call on the appellate court to substitute a verdict of
> > GUILTY, and suggest the death penalty.
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Ribbon Holdings
> ===
ok, is this repealed, or isn't it. I've completely lost track.
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> Also, the capitalization customs have changed greatly, in earlier periods it
> was almost mandatory to capitalize nearly every Agora-specific term. Although
> this had already been reduced last I was a Player.
Maud went on a purposeful massive capitali
On 09/07/2013 5:46 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Fool wrote:
Generally I don't think it's true the "meta-agreement" is subject to
amendment
by even "true" nomic. There are still limits. What if we made Agora
purport to
be played by the NZ
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, omd wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Lindar Greenwood
wrote:
I initiate a CFJ on the following:
The common vernacular for someone who does something is Xor, where a Xor Xes.
By rule 2408 the 'recordkeepor' is the title for one who keeps records
(or recordkeepes).
By
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Fool wrote:
Generally I don't think it's true the "meta-agreement" is subject to amendment
by even "true" nomic. There are still limits. What if we made Agora purport to
be played by the NZ All Blacks?
This would paralyze the rule unt
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
I meant "buggy requirement" as a hypothetical in my quote (as in,
"satisfies the requirement if it's bugged").
FWIW, I meant omd's interpretation when I wrote the rule originally. Not
that that really counts for anything. (And not that either
interpretation
31 matches
Mail list logo
