On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> I submit the following proposal and pay the Distributability Fee to increase
> the Distributability of this proposal by one.
Dislike. Adds a lot of complexity for little value.
-scshunt
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 1:29 AM, omd wrote:
> However, if not, there is a
> conflict between both of them and 3334, 3249, 3212, 2878, all the
> recent paradox wins
One more gratuitous argument: Actually, this goes back to CFJ 1787.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> Um no, if Elders object _before_ the attempt to act, Rule 2357 says that
> Agora is not Satisfied with the intent, and so point (c) of Rule 1728 would
> not be complied with.
>
> What I'm unsure of is whether, and how long, it is necessary t
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, omd wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
Did 4 days pass since the declaration of intent already, and if it did so,
given the strong precedence claims, does that mean the action can now be
performed? (Since no Elders have objected yet.)
Yes. In f
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:27 AM, John Smith wrote:
> CfJ: Did Machiavelli successfully attempt to to take an action in the quoted
> message?
It would be better to CFJ on whether such an intent could be followed
through on, although I don't think a CFJ is necessary, see below.
> Arguments:
>
> M
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> Did 4 days pass since the declaration of intent already, and if it did so,
> given the strong precedence claims, does that mean the action can now be
> performed? (Since no Elders have objected yet.)
Yes. In fact, it could be performed eve
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Steven Gardner wrote:
R2357:
An Elder is a first-class player who has been registered
continuously for at least 32 days, and also registered for at
least 128 days total (not necessarily contiguously).
I was registered continuously from 1 July 1994 until 19
On Sun, 7 Jul 2013, omd wrote:
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
Pretty sure the Gerontocracy is irrelevant. The only things that matter
(pretending Lindar's message was effective) are that Fool announced
intent within the correct time period, Fool is authorized to perform
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> I intend, without 35 objections, to destroy one yak, under the condition that
> I CANNOT resolve this intent successfully.
Gratuitous: By the precedent of CFJ 2879-80, this is not scammable.
By more recent precedent, it is. I really need to
R2357:
An Elder is a first-class player who has been registered
continuously for at least 32 days, and also registered for at
least 128 days total (not necessarily contiguously).
I was registered continuously from 1 July 1994 until 19 June 2004. If I
registered now, would I ins
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> Pretty sure the Gerontocracy is irrelevant. The only things that matter
> (pretending Lindar's message was effective) are that Fool announced intent
> within the correct time period, Fool is authorized to perform the action, the
> action dep
On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:35 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> Welcome! =D
>
> I submit the following CFJ to the Ambassador-at-Large: { Lindar is a player. }
>
> Arguments: While he claimed intent to register, he did not submit it
> to the right forum. Something something R101, something something
> R23
On 07/07/2013 8:46 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Steven Gardner
wrote:
Class-3 Hazing, Roujo?
Not usually. Class-1 is already a bit much for me.
~ Roujo
Besides pantyhose are so uncomfortable in the summer.
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Steven Gardner
wrote:
> Class-3 Hazing, Roujo?
Not usually. Class-1 is already a bit much for me.
~ Roujo
Class-3 Hazing, Roujo?
On 8 July 2013 10:35, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> Welcome! =D
>
> I submit the following CFJ to the Ambassador-at-Large: { Lindar is a
> player. }
>
> Arguments: While he claimed intent to register, he did not submit it
> to the right forum. Something something R101, someth
Welcome! =D
I submit the following CFJ to the Ambassador-at-Large: { Lindar is a player. }
Arguments: While he claimed intent to register, he did not submit it
to the right forum. Something something R101, something something
R2397.
~ Roujo
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Lindar Greenwood
wrot
On 8 Jul 2013 01:15, "Lindar Greenwood" wrote:
>
> I register. I support Fool's intent to found the Serious party, and I do
so.
Welcome!
NttPF (Not to the Public Forum): which is agora-business. All in-game
actions must be taken there.
Also, your attempt to "do so" fails anyway because of the o
I register. I support Fool's intent to found the Serious party, and I do so.
AFAIK, doing so is illegal, since Elders can still object to the intent.
~ Roujo
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 02:50 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:
>> On 3 July 2013 19:21, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> >> 33
On Jun 29, 2013, at 8:06 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Err, I *earn* a Transparent Ribbon, then award myself a Transparent
> Ribbon. Thanks to Machiavelli, who might want to do the latter too.
I believe you can't earn a Transparent Ribbon now, since you're Renascent. If
you wanted a Transparent Ribbon,
ok, got it now. only oerjan around though atm. No surprise, really.
On 7 July 2013 21:00, Steven Gardner wrote:
> OK, I think I've joined ##nomic, but I can't see a way to chat.
>
>
> On 7 July 2013 14:23, Alex Smith wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2013-07-06 at 21:13 -0700, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> > On S
OK, I think I've joined ##nomic, but I can't see a way to chat.
On 7 July 2013 14:23, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-07-06 at 21:13 -0700, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 13:45 +1000, Steven Gardner wrote:
> > >> I inten
22 matches
Mail list logo
