On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Some may, in certain circumstances, have a value that is not
> immediately discernible solely by taking the rules and some other
> subset of game state, and performing a calculation. This indicates to
> me that they are properly considered as game
Everyone's seen "Primer" right?
--
You've got to wiggle before you can crawl
On Jun 16, 2013 12:04 PM, "Kerim Aydin" wrote:
> Those "reasonable house rules" are a good way to think of precedent - not
> as binding as in the common law, and certainly not algorithmic - but out
of
> fairness to all players, you generally refer to past decisions if the same
> sort of problem c
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
> It is entirely unreasonable for
> a real-life court to say "Well, I can't give a judgment because of a
> paradox in the Constitution." The court must try to find the most
> consistent interpretation, whereas Agora does not see itself as
> needing to be bou
4 matches
Mail list logo
