Gratuitous evidence:
tswett: does Entreco have any players other than yourself?
No.
Dear Agora Nomic,
My name is Tanner Swett, and I am the ambassador of the newly created nomic
Entreco. Or at least I thought I was; apparently I neglected to add a rule
defining that ministry.
We have a currency known as the zloty, which is intended to serve as a stable
and liquid currency tha
On 30 May 2013, at 23:21, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Perhaps we should review officer prerogatives as a separate exercise. It
> might be cool to bring back officers with significant influence as the Grand
> Poobah had.
>
Agreed.
> Also, I realize now that the Promotor actually gets a fair bit of leeway
On May 30, 2013 6:17 PM, "Charles Walker"
wrote:
>
> On 30 May 2013, at 23:03, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>
>> On May 30, 2013 5:21 PM, "omd" wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Charles Walker
>> > wrote:
>> > > In a given Agoran week, the Promotor SHALL, as part of eir
>> > >
On 30 May 2013, at 23:03, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On May 30, 2013 5:21 PM, "omd" wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Charles Walker
> > wrote:
> > > In a given Agoran week, the Promotor SHALL, as part of eir
> > > weekly duties:
> > > a) distribute the MI pending proposa
On May 30, 2013 5:21 PM, "omd" wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
> > In a given Agoran week, the Promotor SHALL, as part of eir
> > weekly duties:
> > a) distribute the MI pending proposals with the highest
> > Distributability, breakin
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> In a given Agoran week, the Promotor SHALL, as part of eir
> weekly duties:
> a) distribute the MI pending proposals with the highest
> Distributability, breaking ties in favour of proposals which
> were s
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> I initiate a CFJ on the statement "If the time period for judging CFJ 3318a
> ends with no majority opinion among members of the panel assigned to it, then
> the Ambassador-At-Large will be REQUIRED to cause the panel to judge either
> REMA
On 30 May 2013 19:58, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Yeah. In my experience, distribution fees are hurtful to new players and a
> great way to slow the game down even further in a lull. MI seems like a nice
> way to deal with that, and I don't think we should throw a distributability
> fee in.
Ok. Is the fol
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 30 May 2013 19:38, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > I'm not a fan of "non-zero" distributability here, incidentally. I think
> > that proposals should be distributable by default. If you disagree, I'll
> > submit a proposal to that effect.
>
> You m
On 30 May 2013 19:38, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I'm not a fan of "non-zero" distributability here, incidentally. I think
> that proposals should be distributable by default. If you disagree, I'll
> submit a proposal to that effect.
You mean that you would distribute the N most distributable proposals,
e
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On May 30, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Charles Walker wrote:
> > In a given Agoran week, the Promotor SHALL, as part of eir
> > weekly duties:
> > a) distribute no more than MI pending proposals with non-zero
> > Distributabilit
On May 30, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Charles Walker wrote:
> In a given Agoran week, the Promotor SHALL, as part of eir
> weekly duties:
> a) distribute no more than MI pending proposals with non-zero
> Distributability such that the sum of the Distributabilities
> of the di
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> Note that the use of 'pending', which was defined by the Yaks
> proposal, means that the Promotor is never required to distribute a
> proposal in the same week in which it was submitted.
Oops, sorry! I guess the original wording makes more
On 27 May 2013 23:31, Ed Murphy wrote:
> == CFJ 3324 ==
I plan to accept scshunt's arguments here, unless there are any
counterarguments?
-- Walker
15 matches
Mail list logo
