On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>
> On May 5, 2013 1:03 AM, "Henri Bouchard" wrote:
>>
>> Who is the current Rulekeepor?
>>
>
> It hasn't changed since I published my report...
He just subscribed.
It's woggle, ruleset is at
https://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~charles/agora/current_f
On May 5, 2013 1:03 AM, "Henri Bouchard" wrote:
>
> Who is the current Rulekeepor?
>
It hasn't changed since I published my report...
-scshunt
One more test - this time I'm trying to fix the "DIS: Re:" problem.
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 4:19 PM, omd wrote:
> I fixed something, but I also didn't receive any digest when I ran
> senddigests. Testing again. Sorry for the spam.
Never mind. It should be fixed now. Also, the archives are now being
properly updated.
I fixed something, but I also didn't receive any digest when I ran
senddigests. Testing again. Sorry for the spam.
On May 4, 2013, at 3:50 PM, omd wrote:
> testing digest.
27651d0c334cb6854405a83455d9b9cdc189975554af78a8aeb553f47fd1a3f9
—Machiavelli
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 3:50 PM, omd wrote:
> testing digest.
oops, derp.
testing digest.
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 12:20 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
>
> > I create 1035 promises titled "berk" in my possession. Text: "I transfer
> > the specified trading card to the cashier, as long as the specified trading
> > card is one of the followin
On May 4, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 00:43 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> I destroy this Promise, because it can never be cashed.
>> How?
>>> I destroy these promises, because they have nonexistent authors.
>> How?
>
> I own them. Promises are assets, people! They're
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 00:43 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > I destroy this Promise, because it can never be cashed.
> How?
> >I destroy these promises, because they have nonexistent authors.
> How?
I own them. Promises are assets, people! They're tradeable just like any
other currency, and destroyable
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 1:26 AM, omd wrote:
>> The modified value
>> of an instance of an integral switch is its value, plus the sum of
>> all its Modifiers, but never more than the switch's Maximum or
>> less than its Minimum.
>
> Well, I claimed on IRC that this is unclear
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I destroy these promises, because they have nonexistent authors.
>
> How?
>
>> I destroy this Promise, because it can never be cashed.
>
> How?
Yeah, it looks like there is no mechanism for this to happen, and so
these actions straightforwardly
I'll submit the proposal before the deadline on Sunday. Any final comments?
There's a list of salaries, fees and rewards at the end. A quick
spreadsheet showing how Yak ownership changes long term (assuming no
expenditure and the only income is from the activity wage and office
salaries) is here:
14 matches
Mail list logo
