On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:18 PM, omd wrote:
> Well, no point in rebutting this since it's already opined, but for
> the record, I still strongly disagree with this line of reasoning... I
> believe that it gratuitously changes what the rules say into what
> they're meant to say, inferring from one
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> First, it was ruled in CFJ 3287 that it is impossible to cash ais523's
> promises to give ais523 trading cards in exchange for other trading
> cards. The result is that Max Schutz, scshunt, and I gave trading
> cards to ais523, expecting to re
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
wrote:
> I agree that "A player can do [action] without objection" translates
> to "A golem can do [action] without objection", not simply "A golem
> can do [action]" without the objection part. I think it's reasonable
> to say that a Player ann
First, it was ruled in CFJ 3287 that it is impossible to cash ais523's
promises to give ais523 trading cards in exchange for other trading
cards. The result is that Max Schutz, scshunt, and I gave trading
cards to ais523, expecting to receive trading cards in return, but in
fact got nothing. Should
4 matches
Mail list logo
