DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3268 assigned to omd

2012-09-17 Thread omd
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: > I have published an ATC report. scshunt, any arguments on this one?

DIS: Re: BUS: One scam deserves another

2012-09-17 Thread omd
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: > I spend a ruble to increase my voting limit on the decision to adopt > Proposal 7302 by 1. > > I spend a ruble to increase G.'s voting limit on the decision to adopt > Proposal 7302 by 1. Nice.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 7302 and 7307

2012-09-17 Thread Sean Hunt
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:57 AM, FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote: > Check Rule 955 again - it says that an Agoran Decision gets its > outcome when its voting period ends, not when it's resolved. It says that an Agoran Decision whose voting period has ended has an outcome. It doesn't say that t

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 7302 and 7307

2012-09-17 Thread FKA441344
Check Rule 955 again - it says that an Agoran Decision gets its outcome when its voting period ends, not when it's resolved. On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:47 AM, FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote: >> CoE: neither of these proposals failed quorum,

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 7302 and 7307

2012-09-17 Thread Sean Hunt
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:47 AM, FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote: > CoE: neither of these proposals failed quorum, as quorum at the end > of the voting period for each of them was 1. Irrelevant. See Rule 955. -scshunt