Re: DIS: Re: BUS: now that chambers are back...

2012-09-10 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, omd wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Well, that's quite the bug, seeing that someone could do the same thing > > right now with a "nasty" proposal... and no real AI limit there, either. > > Such proposals could be democratized, since people d

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: now that chambers are back...

2012-09-10 Thread omd
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Well, that's quite the bug, seeing that someone could do the same thing > right now with a "nasty" proposal... and no real AI limit there, either. Such proposals could be democratized, since people didn't like my proposal to repeal it... playe

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: now that chambers are back...

2012-09-10 Thread Tanner Swett
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Er, shall we fix plutocracy then, one of: > 1. tweak quorum to include first class persons with 0 voting power, > 2. put default voting power of 1, > 3. make it cost to make a proposal plutocratic in the first place, > 4. allow spending

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: now that chambers are back...

2012-09-10 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Sean Hunt wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Yep. It's "end of voting period" so people pay attention to that type > > of thing, and if you beat someone by jumping in at the last minute: well > > done. And a reason to spend rubles defensively,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: now that chambers are back...

2012-09-10 Thread Sean Hunt
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Yep. It's "end of voting period" so people pay attention to that type > of thing, and if you beat someone by jumping in at the last minute: well > done. And a reason to spend rubles defensively, too. > > Think of it as awarding wins for peopl

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: now that chambers are back...

2012-09-10 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Tanner Swett wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > If a single Player has a voting limit on an Agoran Decision > > that has a Chamber, and that voting limit, at the end of the > > Decision's voting period, is greater than the com

DIS: Re: BUS: now that chambers are back...

2012-09-10 Thread Tanner Swett
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > If a single Player has a voting limit on an Agoran Decision > that has a Chamber, and that voting limit, at the end of the > Decision's voting period, is greater than the combined voting > limits of all other entities o