On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> I morally object to this objection, as a player can straightforwardly
> determine whether e is included via the algorithm {return true;}.
In practice, it only applies to players who have been inactive for at
least 3 months - 4-14 days; that may or
On 06/24/2012 07:19 PM, omd wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>> For each player, I intend, without objection, to deregister em.
>
> I object to all of these, as you could do those players the favor of
> naming them so they can more easily determine whether they'r
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 3:26 PM, FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I intend to, With Notice, initiate a criminal case: omd violated Rule
> 2143 by failing to distribute by the end of Sun. 24 June proposals in
> the proposal pool that were in there at the beginning of Mon. 18 June.
Oh, come on!
3 matches
Mail list logo
