Re: DIS: Re: BUS: hmm

2012-03-11 Thread Elliott Hird
On 12 March 2012 05:28, Sean Hunt wrote: > No, but the proposed rule does. FOR

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: hmm

2012-03-11 Thread Sean Hunt
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:25, omd wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Sean Hunt > wrote: >> Proposal: Truisms (AI=3) >> {{{ >> Enact a new 3-power rule entitled "The Cold Hard Truth" reading "Every >> rule has an exception." >> }}} > > AGAINST, Rule 104 does not have an exception. > No,

DIS: Re: BUS: hmm

2012-03-11 Thread omd
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Proposal: Truisms (AI=3) > {{{ > Enact a new 3-power rule entitled "The Cold Hard Truth" reading "Every > rule has an exception." > }}} AGAINST, Rule 104 does not have an exception.

DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

2012-03-11 Thread omd
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: > I register. > -- > bayes 2012-03-21 02:22:50 + This is a good idea.

DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement of 3173, intent to appeal 3172, support for intent to appeal 3151, and support for intents to make cases notable

2012-03-11 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012, FKA441344 wrote: > If I have not yet judged case 3173, I judge it as follows: > Per cases 3170 and 3154, I judge this case FALSE. > > If I judged case 3172 FALSE, I intend to appeal it with two support, > on the grounds that the judgement I assigned to it was intended for