G. wrote:
CFJ: Tanner Swett selected a confusing nickname for H. Person Formerly.
NttPF
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Tanner Swett wrote:
> that's not H. Person's fault; it's ours.
Confusing is never confusing to the communicator, e knows what e means.
Confusing is in the eyes of the beholder(s).
CFJ: Tanner Swett selected a confusing nickname for H. Person Formerly.
Arguments: The rule
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I initiate a criminal case:
> (a) defendant: The Person Formerly Known As 441344
> (b) action: selecting the nickname "The Person Formerly Known As 441344"
> (c) rule violated: Rule 2170 (Who Am I?)
>
> Arguments
>
> In the last week, I have s
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > Gratuitous: The first method being limited to the announcer is an
> > inherent part of it, and similarly without-objection is an inherent
> > part of the second. Past exceptions to this common-sense appro
4 matches
Mail list logo
