Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I call 441,334 CFJs

2012-01-29 Thread Pavitra
On 01/29/2012 11:59 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Pavitra wrote: >> Similar remarks apply for "Tavros Nitram", "Pavitra", and "Goethe". (I >> don't recall whether G. changed eir name before or after the current >> name rule was written, but the statute of limitations is almost >> ce

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I call 441,334 CFJs

2012-01-29 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Pavitra wrote: > Similar remarks apply for "Tavros Nitram", "Pavitra", and "Goethe". (I > don't recall whether G. changed eir name before or after the current > name rule was written, but the statute of limitations is almost > certainly run out on that one anyway.) There may

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I call 441,334 CFJs

2012-01-29 Thread Pavitra
On 01/29/2012 07:58 PM, omd wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Tanner Swett wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:35 PM, omd wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Tanner Swett wrote: —Machiavelli >> >> ...Did I spell it wrong? >> >> —Machiavelli > > No, but it has been generally

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I call 441,334 CFJs

2012-01-29 Thread Tanner Swett
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:58 PM, omd wrote: > No, but it has been generally used to refer to another entity within > the past three months. ... I knew that. —Machiavelli

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I call 441,334 CFJs

2012-01-29 Thread omd
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Tanner Swett wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:35 PM, omd wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Tanner Swett wrote: >>> —Machiavelli > > ...Did I spell it wrong? > > —Machiavelli No, but it has been generally used to refer to another entity within the past

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I call 441,334 CFJs

2012-01-29 Thread Tanner Swett
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:35 PM, omd wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Tanner Swett wrote: >> —Machiavelli ...Did I spell it wrong? —Machiavelli

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I call 441,334 CFJs

2012-01-29 Thread omd
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Tanner Swett wrote: > —Machiavelli

DIS: Re: BUS: I call 441,334 CFJs

2012-01-29 Thread Tanner Swett
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 5:21 PM, The Person Formerly Known As 441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote: > I hereby change my nickname from 441344 to The Person Formerly Known As > 441344. > I submit as arguments to the first CFJ initiated in the above-quoted > message the text {It is unlikely that any play

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement of CFJs 3154, 3156

2012-01-29 Thread The Person Formerly Known As 441344
On 1/29/12, Tanner Swett wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:12 AM, 441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote: >> CFJ 3156: >> Such a ratification could not cause a person to become a player >> without their consent, because doing so would introduce an >> inconsistency between the gamestate and rule 101, bu

DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement of CFJs 3154, 3156

2012-01-29 Thread Tanner Swett
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:12 AM, 441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote: > CFJ 3156: > Such a ratification could not cause a person to become a player > without their consent, because doing so would introduce an > inconsistency between the gamestate and rule 101, but this  would > generally not be fulfil

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Elections

2012-01-29 Thread Ed Murphy
ehird wrote: I assume Murphy and vote Murphy in all current elections. CoE: No you don't.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3135 assigned to Machiavelli

2012-01-29 Thread Ed Murphy
Tanner Swett wrote: So, if we disallow prosecuting John Does, then we don't get the satisfaction of punishing them. If we allow prosecuting them, we don't get the satisfaction of having a fully known game state. Maybe Rule 2170's sock-puppet mechanism could be fixed up for the purpose, along t