On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> As far as I can tell, we usually interpret in the way that makes the
> rules not-broken. We treat the rules as meaning what they seem to mean
> and what they are intended to mean. This does not block scams
> categorically, because this standard onl
On 12/14/2011 09:29 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I cash the Promise (2011-04-24 omd).
>
> I believe this has been shown to fail since it was not done (and
> indeed cannot be done) simultaneously with the judgment.
The promise says "has just assigned a judgement", which I assumed meant
earlier in the s
> I cash the Promise (2011-04-24 omd).
I believe this has been shown to fail since it was not done (and
indeed cannot be done) simultaneously with the judgment.
-scshunt
3 matches
Mail list logo
