On 8 December 2011 05:16, Pavitra wrote:
> According to the Registrar's report, ehird's most-recent registration
> before this CFJ was 26 February 2009. FALSE by any sensible standard of
> "recent".
Wow, I stayed registered for that long?
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 01:14, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Bucky wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 15:44, Sean Hunt
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 12:36, Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3127
= Criminal Case 3
Bucky wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 15:44, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 12:36, Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3127
= Criminal Case 3127 =
Bucky committed the Class-6 Crime of Naugh
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 21:33, John Smith wrote:
> CfJ (1), inquiry, barring scshunt:
> "Scshunt violated a rule with his judgment on the Criminal Case above."
> CfJ (2), inquiry, barring scshunt:
> "A judgment of EXILE has no effect if the defendant is not a player when
> it has been continuously
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 6:33 PM, John Smith wrote:
> CfJ (1), inquiry, barring scshunt:
> "Scshunt violated a rule with his judgment on the Criminal Case above."
Gratuitous: Purporting to do something impossible, even intentionally,
is not currently a rule violation.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Voting results for Proposals 7136 - 7143:
>
> [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the
> following proposals. For each decision, the options available to
> Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!).]
Tanner Swett wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Tanner Swett wrote:
Arguments: to me, "did I register?" sounds like it's asking about a
specific time period (in this case, the time that the ehird's message
was sent), much the way that "did you buy milk at the gas station
scshunt wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 15:44, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 12:36, Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3127
= Criminal Case 3127 =
Bucky committed the Class-6 Crime of Naug
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Tanner Swett wrote:
>> Arguments: to me, "did I register?" sounds like it's asking about a
>> specific time period (in this case, the time that the ehird's message
>> was sent), much the way that "did you buy milk at the gas station?" is
>> askin
On 7 December 2011 21:47, ais523 wrote:
> Indeed, I noticed the same thing, and my thoughts were, in order, "how
> do I scam this?" and "good thing we have ratification".
Someone should probably check Mr. Snuggles' posts...
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 21:44 +, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 7 December 2011 21:39, Pavitra wrote:
> > Nice try, but 754 explicitly specifies "...for all purposes."
> > Determining intent is a purpose.
>
> Yikes. This could easily muck with the interpretation of any message
> where, e.g. a sentenc
On 7 December 2011 21:39, Pavitra wrote:
> Nice try, but 754 explicitly specifies "...for all purposes."
> Determining intent is a purpose.
Yikes. This could easily muck with the interpretation of any message
where, e.g. a sentence that ends a line was not terminated with a full
stop.
On 12/07/2011 03:36 PM, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 7 December 2011 21:14, ais523 wrote:
>> I judge CFJ 3130 FALSE. Rule 754 defines difference in the type or
>> amount of whitespace as completely irrelevant in all forms of
>> communication for all purposes, so ehird's message can only be read as
>>
On 7 December 2011 21:14, ais523 wrote:
> I judge CFJ 3130 FALSE. Rule 754 defines difference in the type or
> amount of whitespace as completely irrelevant in all forms of
> communication for all purposes, so ehird's message can only be read as
> "Do or did I register. ? (CFJ.)", which can only r
ehird wrote:
On 7 December 2011 19:55, Elliott Hird wrote:
I support.
Uh, and do so. I forgot that newfangled mechanism.
Can we get someone else to support and do so, in case ehird's
registration was ineffective?
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > And "do [...] I register" can be read as one statement, such that the
> > CFJ is interpreted to be referring to events at the same time as the
> > registration, in which case it would be TRUE.
>
> Arguments: See CFJ 1267.
Awww. You beat me to it, old-t
16 matches
Mail list logo
