On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:28 PM, omd wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Having a base text published, then having a second message published saying
>> "this now overrides the base text" is no different than having something
>> at the bottom of the base text saying "that
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Pavitra wrote:
>> On 07/08/2011 10:18 PM, omd wrote:
>> > *arguably Agora would cease to be a person in the interval between the
>> > adoption of a proposal and the publication of an updated ruleset?
>>
>> The resolution
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Pavitra wrote:
> On 07/08/2011 10:18 PM, omd wrote:
> > *arguably Agora would cease to be a person in the interval between the
> > adoption of a proposal and the publication of an updated ruleset?
>
> The resolution of a proposal generally includes the text of the changes;
>
omd wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Eric Stucky wrote:
>>> 7086 3 Â G., etc. Â Â Â Â Jig-jiggery jig-jiggery
>> MURPH/PRESENT
>
> Although the intent is clear, I think the language of R2280 makes this
> evaluate to "MURPH*2, PRESENT*2".
It'll be covered by CFJ 3064 (which I'll rot
4 matches
Mail list logo
