On 23 June 2011 05:18, Pavitra wrote:
> Are you trying to get at the "select two votes" thing? I think it pretty
> clearly evaluates down to one selection at the end.
No; comex is arguing that the action is interpreted as (vote(MURPH or
AGAINST)); I am arguing for (vote(MURPH) or vote(AGAINST)),
On 06/22/2011 07:47 PM, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 22 June 2011 01:33, omd wrote:
>> Arguments: func(a || b) is not generally equivalent to func(a) || func(b).
>
> Arguments: Is "AGAINST if Murphy sucks, else PRESENT" one vote, or a
> conditional branch of two votes?
Are you trying to get at the "
On 22 June 2011 01:33, omd wrote:
> Arguments: func(a || b) is not generally equivalent to func(a) || func(b).
Arguments: Is "AGAINST if Murphy sucks, else PRESENT" one vote, or a
conditional branch of two votes?
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Pavitra wrote:
> On 06/22/2011 05:53 PM, omd wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> The contestmaster's decision on these awards is final. Making these awards
> >> ends any ongoing Expedition. The Contestmaster CANNOT award emself Pitons.
> >>
On 06/22/2011 05:53 PM, omd wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> The contestmaster's decision on these awards is final. Making these awards
>> ends any ongoing Expedition. The Contestmaster CANNOT award emself Pitons.
>> If no Delves occurred during a Delving Period, t
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> The contestmaster's decision on these awards is final. Making these awards
> ends any ongoing Expedition. The Contestmaster CANNOT award emself Pitons.
> If no Delves occurred during a Delving Period, the Contestmaster CAN instead
> announce
6 matches
Mail list logo
