On 06/16/2011 08:25 PM, omd wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> CFJ: Rule 2344 was amended in the same message that this case
>> was initiated.
>>
>> Evidence: the above text.
>
> Gratuitous: The President's power is 0 because 7067 failed quorum.
I believe that all t
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> CFJ: Rule 2344 was amended in the same message that this case
> was initiated.
>
> Evidence: the above text.
Gratuitous: The President's power is 0 because 7067 failed quorum.
On 06/16/2011 03:30 PM, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Er, maybe in the old version you'd be right, but it's pretty explicit now:
>> For the purpose of protecting this right, a rule
>> change which would otherwise take effect wi
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Er, maybe in the old version you'd be right, but it's pretty explicit now:
> For the purpose of protecting this right, a rule
> change which would otherwise take effect without its
> substance being
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> CoE on 7069: Wooble also voted PRESENT. It is adopted (and, now
> that 7074 has taken effect, it also takes effect).
I'm confused. Did you ever actually resolve 7069 correctly? (The CoE
does not include a list of ballots...)
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Pavitra wrote:
> > On 06/16/2011 12:47 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > No, no timers. I'm saying that the cutoff for publicity should be that
> > the players are informed of the change no later than in the same message
> > in which the cha
On 06/16/2011 12:47 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Pavitra wrote:
>> On 06/16/2011 12:14 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Pavitra wrote:
On 06/16/2011 10:54 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> [Disclaimer: I attempt thi
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Pavitra wrote:
> On 06/16/2011 12:47 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> No, no timers. I'm saying that the cutoff for publicity should be that
> the players are informed of the change no later than in the same message
> in which the change occurs.
>
> If a Rule Change somehow tried to
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Pavitra wrote:
> On 06/16/2011 12:14 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Pavitra wrote:
> >> On 06/16/2011 10:54 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
> [Disclaimer: I attempt this, but it may be ineffective for some
> reaso
On 06/16/2011 12:14 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Pavitra wrote:
>> On 06/16/2011 10:54 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
[Disclaimer: I attempt this, but it may be ineffective for some
reason that I haven't noticed.]
As Speaker, I
On 16 June 2011 06:25, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I destroy 250 points in Walker's possession to cause em to satisfy
> the Victory Condition of Accumulation (everyone else's are halved).
>
> -G.
Thank you, I suppose. I should have got round to doing that.
This is my first win of Agora.
--
Charles Wa
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Pavitra wrote:
> On 06/16/2011 10:54 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >> [Disclaimer: I attempt this, but it may be ineffective for some
> >> reason that I haven't noticed.]
> >>
> >> As Speaker, I cause the (now Power=1) President
On 16 June 2011 03:39, Sean Hunt wrote:
> FALSE; "worst Promotor ever" is not the same as "Promotor".
Have you considered the reading that I immediately assumed, i.e.
"I nominate myself [for this election], [running] as the worst Promotor ever."?
13 matches
Mail list logo
