On 06/06/2011 07:35 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> P.S: Don't worry, it's intentional. Thanks for trying to help, though. =P
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 19:43 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
> If possible, I support and do so.
On 06/07/2011 06:46 AM, ais523 wrote:
> Note: the above message, combined with simila
Which is actually why it leads to an objection. What CFJ was that again?
~ Roujo
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 06:46 AM, ais523 wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 19:43 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
>>> On 06/06/2011 07:35 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
P.S: Don't worry
On 06/07/2011 06:46 AM, ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 19:43 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
>> On 06/06/2011 07:35 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
>>> P.S: Don't worry, it's intentional. Thanks for trying to help, though. =P
>>>
>>> ~ Roujo
>>
>> If possible, I support and do so.
>>
>> Pavitra
>
> Not
On 4 June 2011 05:03, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>>> 7068 2 Walker Spending Points
>> CoE: I withdrew this version and submitted a fixed one which prevents
>> spending the same points on multiple actions.
>
> Admitted. This was improperly distr
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 19:43 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
> On 06/06/2011 07:35 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> > P.S: Don't worry, it's intentional. Thanks for trying to help, though. =P
> >
> > ~ Roujo
>
> If possible, I support and do so.
>
> Pavitra
Note: the above message, combined with similar on
5 matches
Mail list logo
