DIS: Re: BUS: Court Circular: 28 March - 3 April 2011

2011-04-05 Thread Elliott Hird
Is there a reason this is sent to a-b rather than the seemingly more-appropriate a-d? :)

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6978-6995

2011-04-05 Thread Ed Murphy
Wooble wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> I don't think they would be much more coherent if that hadn't happened. > > I agree, although I'm working on a fix. For the record, I'd be interested in further discussion of the Dragons concept; there were some hints of new an

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6978-6995

2011-04-05 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > I don't think they would be much more coherent if that hadn't happened. I agree, although I'm working on a fix.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6978-6995

2011-04-05 Thread Tanner Swett
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Charles Walker wrote: > On 5 April 2011 00:08, Tanner Swett wrote: >>> 6984 2.0 Walker              Cleanup >> AGAINST >> >>> 6985 1.0 Walker              no equity cases >> AGAINST > > Um, why? The fact that these things aren't currently being used doesn't mean

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6978-6995

2011-04-05 Thread Ed Murphy
omd wrote: > On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> NUM AI SUBMITTER TITLE >> 6978 2.0 Murphy The Pear-Shaped Office >> 6979 1.0 Tanner L. Swett Killing Dragons Is Everything Around Here >> 6980 3.0 Murphy Timey wimey >> 6981 3.0 Murphy

DIS: Re: BUS: Decision Decisions

2011-04-05 Thread Ed Murphy
Walker wrote: > Amend Rule 955 (Determining the Will of Agora) by inserting the > following after paragraph (b) and replacing the second "(c)" with > "(d)". > > (c) If other rules attempt to define a method for determining > the outcome of a particular type of decision, then this

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Census

2011-04-05 Thread Charles Walker
On 5 April 2011 18:32, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Charles Walker wrote: >> NoV: Yally violated Rule 1504 (a Power 2 Rule) by becoming active >> during eir timeout period. >> > Gratuitous argument:  The suspension, even if it didn't make > em active, suspended the SHALL NOT allegedly

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6978-6995

2011-04-05 Thread omd
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > NUM  AI  SUBMITTER           TITLE > 6978 2.0 Murphy              The Pear-Shaped Office > 6979 1.0 Tanner L. Swett     Killing Dragons Is Everything Around Here > 6980 3.0 Murphy              Timey wimey > 6981 3.0 Murphy              Little

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] Docket

2011-04-05 Thread Ed Murphy
Tanner Swett wrote: > Come to think of it, I sit, and set my judicial rank to 3. Judicial ranks no longer exist (they were repealed along with interest indices).

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] Docket

2011-04-05 Thread Ed Murphy
Tanner Swett wrote: > I stand. You can't do that directly, you have to sit and then wait for the next rotation.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Well, it meets the requirements...

2011-04-05 Thread Ed Murphy
Tanner Swett wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:15 PM, omd wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >>> omd wrote: >>> The AFO registers. >>> >>> CoE: First, it terminated when contracts were repealed (the arguments >>> in CFJ 2761 apply equally to the third paragraph of

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6978-6995

2011-04-05 Thread Charles Walker
On 5 April 2011 00:08, Tanner Swett wrote: >> 6984 2.0 Walker              Cleanup > AGAINST > >> 6985 1.0 Walker              no equity cases > AGAINST Um, why? -- Charles Walker

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Well, it meets the requirements...

2011-04-05 Thread Jonathan Rouillard
I support a number of times equal to the number of bears in Canada, or 12000 times if that number is unclear or unknown. ~ Roujo On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:50 PM, omd wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Tanner Swett wrote: >>> I think receivi