DIS: Re: BUS: Hello

omd wrote: > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> omd wrote: >> >>> Guess what I intend to do at this time? >> >> Obligatory CFJ, disqualifying omd: Â omd is a player. > > CFJ: If I registered in the quoted message, I would currently be District. > > Arguments: District is the de

DIS: 6928-6940

I mentioned this twice in a-d in the context of other discussions, but I'm not sure if you saw it, so to be more explicit: H. Murphy, if/when you gain the office of Assessor again, can you re-resolve 6928-6940, with a tally that does not include my ballots on the ordinary decisions? Thanks.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Hello

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 18:55, Jonathan Rouillard < jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > > Obligatory CFJ, disqualifying omd: omd is a player. > > But... If omd is a player... He can be assigned... If he's not... He > can't... Why bar him? =P >

DIS: Re: BUS: Hello

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Obligatory CFJ, disqualifying omd:  omd is a player. But... If omd is a player... He can be assigned... If he's not... He can't... Why bar him? =P Oh. Wait. He might become a player before CFJs are assigned... Got it. (^_^) ~ Roujo P.S: Sorry f