DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Restore the terrible choice

2010-11-29 Thread comexk
On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:52 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Proposal: Restore the terrible choice > (disinterested, distributable by announcement) Terrible? >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Fear cleanup

2010-11-29 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, omd wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > > >         1) Select a rule at random, and submit a proposal whose effect > > >            is limited to repealing that rule (and, if necessary, > > > > This remov

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Fear cleanup

2010-11-29 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, omd wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > >         1) Select a rule at random, and submit a proposal whose effect > >            is limited to repealing that rule (and, if necessary, > > This removes eir choice of which of the two selected rules to

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Fear cleanup

2010-11-29 Thread omd
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >         1) Select a rule at random, and submit a proposal whose effect >            is limited to repealing that rule (and, if necessary, This removes eir choice of which of the two selected rules to repeal, and which to amend, which might decr

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Fear cleanup

2010-11-29 Thread Sean Hunt
On 10-11-30 12:13 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: scshunt wrote: What changes does this make? Clarifies which of the first two random selections is tied to which part of the duty, requires noting the titles of those rules, and rewords the "is responsible for" part. (And changes MUST NOT to SHALL NOT at

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Fear cleanup

2010-11-29 Thread Ed Murphy
scshunt wrote: > What changes does this make? Clarifies which of the first two random selections is tied to which part of the duty, requires noting the titles of those rules, and rewords the "is responsible for" part. (And changes MUST NOT to SHALL NOT at the end, because it sounds more natural

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Fear cleanup

2010-11-29 Thread Sean Hunt
On 10-11-29 11:57 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: Proposal: Fear cleanup Amend Rule 2309 (The Propose-O-matic) to read: The Fearmongor is an Office. Its holder is responsible for encouraging frequent rule changes. Each week, the Fearmongor SHALL do the following: 1) Selec

DIS: Re: BUS: ninja'd

2010-11-29 Thread Ed Murphy
Yally wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 14:25, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> I assume the office of IADoP. >> I assume the office of Herald. >> I assume the office of Registrar. >> >> I sit up. I flip my judicial rank to 3. >> >> I call for judgement on "Wooble is the judge of CFJ 2908.", and set >> t

DIS: Re: BUS: Heavy lies the Head of State

2010-11-29 Thread omd
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I make myself Inactive. > I crown omd (highest-ranked active player). > I make myself Active. Thanks... although there's a good chance this fails, because none of the attempted players I attempted to make popes were ready for it. :o

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: ninja'd

2010-11-29 Thread omd
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> Oh, and the report also lists you as a Senator, which is a statement >> that is impossible to make correct by any modification of the >> gamestate; this may make it impossible to ratify the document. > > Senator-ness doesn't self-ratify. I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: ninja'd

2010-11-29 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 15:20, omd wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:10 PM, omd wrote: >>> Gratuitous: The report includes "Wooble possibly deregisters" in the >>> "Recent events" section, although I don't think this affects anything. >>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: ninja'd

2010-11-29 Thread omd
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:10 PM, omd wrote: >> Gratuitous: The report includes "Wooble possibly deregisters" in the >> "Recent events" section, although I don't think this affects anything. > > Indeed, only the list of players is self-ratif

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: ninja'd

2010-11-29 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:10 PM, omd wrote: > Gratuitous: The report includes "Wooble possibly deregisters" in the > "Recent events" section, although I don't think this affects anything. Indeed, only the list of players is self-ratifying; the rest of the report is not.

DIS: Re: BUS: ninja'd

2010-11-29 Thread omd
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > I assume the office of IADoP. > I assume the office of Herald. > I assume the office of Registrar. > > I sit up.  I flip my judicial rank to 3. > > I call for judgement on "Wooble is the judge of CFJ 2908.", and set > the II of this case to