Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Census

2010-11-17 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Elliott Hird wrote: > On 16 November 2010 00:13, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > ThisCFJ->G->disfavor = TRUE. > > I am so glad we do not program in the kind of fake code people make up > to converse in. > > It would be an... interesting whirlwind of semantics^W^W^Wexperience. Hmm,

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Census

2010-11-17 Thread Elliott Hird
On 16 November 2010 00:13, Kerim Aydin wrote: > ThisCFJ->G->disfavor = TRUE. I am so glad we do not program in the kind of fake code people make up to converse in. It would be an... interesting whirlwind of semantics^W^W^Wexperience.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

2010-11-17 Thread ais523
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 10:46 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:55 AM, ais523 wrote: > > Gratuitous: Arguably, the entire point of the contract was an intent to > > someday be a player, with other members of the contract being able to > > choose /when/. > > Rule 869 contains

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

2010-11-17 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:55 AM, ais523 wrote: > Gratuitous: Arguably, the entire point of the contract was an intent to > someday be a player, with other members of the contract being able to > choose /when/. Rule 869 contains the phrase "at that time".

Re: DIS: proto: Marks

2010-11-17 Thread Jonathan Rouillard
That's what I meant: Fun /is/ CfJs all around. =) (It was more of an assignement that a causality statement.) On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: > On 10-11-16 06:32 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote: > >> This confirms what I understand of Agoran Politics so far: >> Fun = CfJs all aroun