On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 20:13, Flameshadowxeroshin <
flameshadowxeros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, 'Clarification of the Replacement of
> the Pope', and make it distributable by fee:
>
> In rule 2316:
>
> [The current rule does not provide any clear way to replace the po
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Flameshadowxeroshin
wrote:
> I retract my proposal, #6893.
Sorry, but you can't: it's not in the Proposal Pool anymore.
On 12 November 2010 02:33, omd wrote:
> However, nobody has proven that Hillary Rodham Clinton isn't a player.
In fact I view it as quite likely.
I also believe that Murphy is a small shell script.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:45 PM, John Smith wrote:
> CfJ(inquiry, barred:the author of the message quoted above):"Hillary Rodham
> Clinton has a prop."
>
> Argument:The prop transfer rule (2287) requires that the player performing
> the transfer explain why e chose the *player* to transfer it to
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, John Smith wrote:
> --- On Thu, 11/11/10, Elliott Hird wrote:
>
> > From: Elliott Hird
> > Subject: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6877-6894
> > To: "agora-business"
> > Date: Thursday, November 11, 2010, 6:17 PM
> > I transfer a prop from myself t
On 12 November 2010 01:45, John Smith wrote:
> Argument:The prop transfer rule (2287) requires that the player performing
> the transfer explain why e chose the *player* to transfer it to. Since
> Hillary Rodham Clinton is not and has never been a player, the quoted attempt
> to transfer a pro
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, com...@gmail.com wrote:
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 11, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >> 6893 O 1 1.0 Flameshadowxeroshin Clarification of the Replacement of the
> >> Pope
> > AGAINST
>
> Why?
Also note, since movement on the List is secured-2, and th
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, com...@gmail.com wrote:
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 11, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >> 6893 O 1 1.0 Flameshadowxeroshin Clarification of the Replacement of the
> >> Pope
> > AGAINST
>
> Why?
It allows the IAdoP to change speakership at will. rather
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 11, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>> 6893 O 1 1.0 Flameshadowxeroshin Clarification of the Replacement of the
>> Pope
> AGAINST
Why?
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:42 PM, omd wrote:
> > I am initiating an auction for one lot of one Ultraviolet Ribbon. The
> > currency is Leadership Tokens. The Starting Bid is one Token, which
> > is presumably also that currency's Minimum Unit Quantity.
> >
> >
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:42 PM, omd wrote:
> I am initiating an auction for one lot of one Ultraviolet Ribbon. The
> currency is Leadership Tokens. The Starting Bid is one Token, which
> is presumably also that currency's Minimum Unit Quantity.
>
> This probably fails, because "the Rule providi
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 16:29 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> I transfer a prop from ais523 to coppro because it was omd, not coppro
> who thought that everyone else was out of prop transfers.
Those two should retroactively avoid formerly having had vaguely similar
names.
--
ais523
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I appeal this verdict as it sets a bad precedent: in cases where an
> > Officer has contradictory duties, it is reasonable for em to choose
> > the lesser rules breakage, and not reasonable, in terms of the
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> Because I'm the Crown Prince... I pay a fee to move the player immediately
>> above me on the list of succession down one place on the list of succession.
>> This fee should be 0.
>
> Er, actua
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> The important point is that the clause "reasonably" is in that rule
> for a purpose. What if deregistering was the only way out of such a
> conundrum, is that reasonable? If not, why is deregistering
> unreasonable but resigning an elected po
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I appeal this verdict as it sets a bad precedent: in cases where an
> Officer has contradictory duties, it is reasonable for em to choose
> the lesser rules breakage, and not reasonable, in terms of the game,
> for em to be essentially required
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I appeal this verdict as it sets a bad precedent: in cases where an
> > Officer has contradictory duties, it is reasonable for em to choose
> > the lesser rules breakage, and not reasonable, in t
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I transfer a prop from Ienpew III (for not doing much of anything,
> > really) to Yally (for finally using these powers in an unabashed
> > political manner).
>
> I transfer a prop from G., for
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 14:12, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > AGAINST, VETO
> [...]
> > FOR, RUBBERSTAMP
> [...]
>
> I transfer a prop from Ienpew III (for not doing much of anything,
> really) to Yally (for finally using these powers in an unabashed
> pol
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I appeal this verdict as it sets a bad precedent: in cases where an
> Officer has contradictory duties, it is reasonable for em to choose
> the lesser rules breakage, and not reasonable, in terms of the game,
> for em to be essentially required
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Because I'm the Crown Prince... I pay a fee to move the player immediately
> above me on the list of succession down one place on the list of succession.
> This fee should be 0.
Not anymore. The fee is now floor[(5+0)/2] = 2. See Proposal 6865.
-
21 matches
Mail list logo
