On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Taral wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:38 AM, omd wrote:
> > I re-intend all above-quoted intents.
>
> I CFJ on the statement "Taral has objected to one or more of omd's
> intended actions in the quoted message." with the above as evidence.
Gratuitous: See CFJ 2316, and
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 15:54 +0200, Keba wrote:
> Dear Agoran community,
>
> I have been offline since Thursday because I changed by provider. During
> this time I could not pull my duties, I am sorry for this. After reading
> 92 new mails (you were quite active!), I will publish some reports.
>
>
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I have no problem with missing a proposal. Announcing that it's
> inconsequential because you think the proposal is stupid isn't
> something I think we expect from our Promotor, though.
Noted. I will be more civil in the future.
Dear Agoran community,
I have been offline since Thursday because I changed by provider. During
this time I could not pull my duties, I am sorry for this. After reading
92 new mails (you were quite active!), I will publish some reports.
You could punish me for not reporting of course, but first,
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Warrigal wrote:
>>> malice. Besides, the proposal is undistributable (to my knowledge) and
>>> stupid, and thus my failure to mention it is essentially
>>> inconsequential.
>>
>> I initiate an election for Promotor.
>
> I note that I've had a particularly busy wee
5 matches
Mail list logo
