Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2860 assigned to Taral

2010-09-20 Thread Taral
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> How does 2312 not apply to judges? > > Ah, not in the CotC database yet.  See the "Judgement" part of this: > http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2010-September/026683.html > > (I admit, I was only half-accurate in

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2860 assigned to Taral

2010-09-20 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Taral wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > And no, it doesn't. > > How does 2312 not apply to judges? Ah, not in the CotC database yet. See the "Judgement" part of this: http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2010-Sept

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2860 assigned to Taral

2010-09-20 Thread Taral
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > And no, it doesn't. How does 2312 not apply to judges? -- Taral "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."     -- Unknown

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: auto-remand

2010-09-20 Thread ais523
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 10:41 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Let me know if you see a hole in this logic or in the protection that > (2) gives... Yep, I missed point (2) altogether, somehow. -- ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: auto-remand

2010-09-20 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, ais523 wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 10:08 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > [most appeals cases end up remanded, the first time at least] > > > > Proto: auto-remand > > > > Create the following rule: Remand for Clarification > > > > If a judicial case: > > 1) has a

DIS: Re: BUS: auto-remand

2010-09-20 Thread ais523
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 10:08 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > [most appeals cases end up remanded, the first time at least] > > Proto: auto-remand > > Create the following rule: Remand for Clarification > > If a judicial case: > 1) has a judgement, that has been in effect for less than seven

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2860 assigned to Taral

2010-09-20 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, omd wrote: > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Taral wrote: > > 9. omd is the Pariah, and Rule 2312 applies to all players, including > > judges. > > No I'm not. And no, it doesn't.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement, CFJ 2862

2010-09-20 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Sean Hunt wrote: > On 09/19/2010 08:57 PM, Taral wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:40 PM, omd wrote: > > > I intend to appeal this with two support. I believe that this > > > judgement is correct, but should clarify that failing to check did not > > > actually absolve co