On 09/01/2010 04:36 PM, ais523 wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 16:29 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
This announcement opens the voting period on the decision to adopt the
winning Website Submission. The Sysadmin is the vote collector; the
voting period is one week. Every active player and Taral are eligib
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> This announcement opens the voting period on the decision to adopt the winning
> Website Submission. The Sysadmin is the vote collector; the voting period is
> one week. Every active player and Taral are eligible voters.
>
> The options are:
>
> Website Su
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, omd wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, com...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> I vote FOR all decisions to adopt proposals currently in their voting
> >> periods.
> >
> > I retract my previous votes on all decisions with ongoing voting p
On 1 September 2010 21:53, Keba wrote:
> Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> I vote for Keba.
>
> Thanks, seems I could have taken the office, if I showed more interest
> for it.
>
> But the voting period had ended about a quarter hour before you
> submitted your vote, so it's invalid.
>
> --
> Keba
Yeah,
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> I vote for Keba.
Thanks, seems I could have taken the office, if I showed more interest
for it.
But the voting period had ended about a quarter hour before you
submitted your vote, so it's invalid.
--
Keba
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 08:41, Warrigal
> wrote:
>
>
> I award myself a capacitor for this judgment.
>
>
This fails because you earned two farads, not one.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Keba wrote:
> Warrigal wrote:
>> I suggest adding a clause like this: "If there is ambiguity about the
>> number of words in a proposal (for example, if there are hyphenated
>> words), it SHOULD be interpreted as containing exactly 1337 words, if
>> possible." Thus,
Warrigal wrote:
> Sgeo and I have created an informal alliance, which we're calling the
> FSCN. The goal of the FSCN is to bring its own members a
> disproportionate amount of power within Agora, and keep it. We shall
> accomplish this by promoting proposals giving power to the elite, and
> allowin
On 1 September 2010 15:08, Warrigal wrote:
> Sgeo and I have created an informal alliance, which we're calling the
> FSCN. The goal of the FSCN is to bring its own members a
> disproportionate amount of power within Agora, and keep it. We shall
> accomplish this by promoting proposals giving power
Sgeo and I have created an informal alliance, which we're calling the
FSCN. The goal of the FSCN is to bring its own members a
disproportionate amount of power within Agora, and keep it. We shall
accomplish this by promoting proposals giving power to the elite, and
allowing players to accumulate po
Warrigal wrote:
> > 6824 G 1 3.5 KebaRights are important
> AGAINST. Setting a rule's power greater than 3 is dangerous, as it
> ends up taking precedence over rules that are supposed to be
> omnipotent.
Shouldn't rights take precedence over *all* other rules?
> > 6825 G 1 1.5 Keb
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:35 PM, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:05 PM, wrote:
>>> For each active player, I intend, with support and with notice, to make em
>>> inactive.
>>
>> CoE: comex can not make players inactive with su
Warrigal wrote:
> That should be "exactly 1337".
>
> I suggest adding a clause like this: "If there is ambiguity about the
> number of words in a proposal (for example, if there are hyphenated
> words), it SHOULD be interpreted as containing exactly 1337 words, if
> possible." Thus, people don't h
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Keba wrote:
> Proposal "Leet Leadership" (AI=1, II=1, distributable via fee)
> {{{
> Create a new Rule with power=1 entitled "Leet Leadership":
>
> When an interested proposal consisting of exact 1337 words
> (excluding information like name, or adopti
14 matches
Mail list logo
