Re: DIS: To repair listlessness

2010-07-26 Thread Sean Hunt
On 07/25/2010 04:29 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: Proto: Reinventing The List (AI-2) Create the following rule, The List of Succession, Power=2: The List of Succession is an ordered list of all current players except the current Speaker. The first (1st) position is the "hi

Re: DIS: computer, locate the first officer please

2010-07-26 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
On 26 July 2010 18:54, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > >              ..."where Lower Deck is adjacent to Enginge Room >      which is also adjacent to Bridge." > > Which is adjacent to what now?  I can parse "which is also" as applying > to either Engine Room or Lower Deck. > > -G. > Really? I'm not a na

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6763-6765

2010-07-26 Thread Sean Hunt
On 07/26/2010 01:13 PM, comex wrote: On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: 6765 P 1 3.0 comex Adoption Without Objection AGAINST (Whether or not I like the idea in general - I haven't decided - it doesn't give consideration to proposal/decision ID numbers, a very l

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6751-6762

2010-07-26 Thread Sean Hunt
On 07/23/2010 01:24 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: 6761 P None 2.0 coppro I Postulate an Assumption AGAINST [just make it flip to Assumed when a player assumes an office, I say] Your proposed fix a) breaks the MWoP and b) doesn't solve the problem that when an officer goes on hold, the o

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6763-6765

2010-07-26 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> In creating my proposal archive, I did notice that Zefram used a "pool >> number", distinct from the distributed proposal ID.  I don't know if >> this was just for eir own recordkeeping or if it

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ATC] Flight Schedule

2010-07-26 Thread comex
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Yally wrote: > >> Pilots require at least 23 props. >> >>       Players with at least 23 props are Pilots; the Pilot with the >>       most props (if any) is the Captain. Players with less than 9 >>       props are Marines. > > Both these number

DIS: Re: OFF: [ATC] Flight Schedule

2010-07-26 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 19:43, Ed Murphy wrote: > 19+ = Pilot (highest = Captain) > 9- = Marine > Pilots require at least 23 props. Players with at least 23 props are Pilots; the Pilot with the most props (if any) is the Captain. Players with less than 9 props are Marines. I'

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6763-6765

2010-07-26 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > In creating my proposal archive, I did notice that Zefram used a "pool > number", distinct from the distributed proposal ID. I don't know if > this was just for eir own recordkeeping or if it was rules-defined > when e was Promotor; I don't remember i

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6763-6765

2010-07-26 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> I don't think it's common enough to make a significant difference, and >> it's rather unusual IMO that proposals in the Proposal Pool have to be >> referred to by title when just about every other tracked body of text >> has an ID number. > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6763-6765

2010-07-26 Thread comex
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I think we've always been ok with "I submit the following proposal and pay a > fee to make it distributable:" and there was some court case a long time > ago that it was ok.  Maybe not.  It was the fact that your sentence no verb: > are you say

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6763-6765

2010-07-26 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, comex wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> Proposal: More ID numbers (AI=2, Distributable via fee) > > > > Does this mean you just paid the fee?  That looks like CFJ-worthy > > ambiguity there... > > Yeah, by the letter of it I'm not sure it's p

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6763-6765

2010-07-26 Thread comex
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> Proposal: More ID numbers (AI=2, Distributable via fee) > > Does this mean you just paid the fee?  That looks like CFJ-worthy > ambiguity there... Yeah, by the letter of it I'm not sure it's possible to make a proposal Distributable before su

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6763-6765

2010-07-26 Thread comex
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > 6765 P 1 3.0 comex               Adoption Without Objection > AGAINST Why?

DIS: H. ATC Murphy

2010-07-26 Thread Aaron Goldfein
I am attempting to republish the PSM's report which requires knowing which players are Marines, Pilots, Captains, etc. Do you know which players are which?

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6763-6765

2010-07-26 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, comex wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> 6765 P 1 3.0 comex               Adoption Without Objection > > AGAINST (Whether or not I like the idea in general - I haven't > > decided - it doesn't give consideration to proposal/decision ID > > num

DIS: computer, locate the first officer please

2010-07-26 Thread Kerim Aydin
..."where Lower Deck is adjacent to Enginge Room which is also adjacent to Bridge." Which is adjacent to what now? I can parse "which is also" as applying to either Engine Room or Lower Deck. -G.