Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Teams proposal

2010-06-26 Thread comex
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> If there is ever simultaneously one or more empty Teams, and one or more >> Independent players, then the any player CAN by announcement, and the >> Referee SHALL as soon as possible unless someone else does first, >> distribute all Independent

DIS: Re: BUS: Teams proposal

2010-06-26 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: > A Team is a sort of entity defined by the rules; creation and > destruction of Teams is secured. Each Teams have a name, which if not "Each Team has a name" > If there is ever simultaneously one or more empty Teams, and one or more > Independent players, then the any player CAN b

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: The Assumption of Mary

2010-06-26 Thread Ed Murphy
ehird wrote: > On 26 June 2010 21:12, Elliott Hird wrote: >> I assume the office of Mary; and prior to doing so, Godot registers. >> >> Godot is me, as of before the previous line. >> >> As of this line, however, Godot is not me. Godot must therefore be waited >> for. >> > > And a first fitful

Re: DIS: Re: The Assumption of Mary

2010-06-26 Thread Elliott Hird
On 27 June 2010 00:31, Taral wrote: > Subscribe the new address and unsubscribe the old address. Yes, but that's the *boring* solution... :)

DIS: Re: The Assumption of Mary

2010-06-26 Thread Taral
Subscribe the new address and unsubscribe the old address. On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: > Sorry that all of these have come at once, by the way; I had an issue > with the lists: I'm on them under my @googlemail.com address, but I am > now @gmail.com. I have temporarily sw

DIS: Re: The Assumption of Mary

2010-06-26 Thread Elliott Hird
On 26 June 2010 21:12, Elliott Hird wrote: > I assume the office of Mary; and prior to doing so, Godot registers. > > Godot is me, as of before the previous line. > > As of this line, however, Godot is not me. Godot must therefore be waited for. > Oh, and before making an ass out of you and umpti

DIS: Re: BUS: Assumption of IADoP

2010-06-26 Thread comex
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > I assume the office of IADoP. You know what happens when you assume?

Re: DIS: Proto: Teams

2010-06-26 Thread Ed Murphy
Yally wrote: > 1. What if a team has only two players? One player could just remove the > other player who could do nothing about it as there would be nobody else > to provide a second objection. It requires em to move the other player to another team, which can also block it with 2 objections.