DIS: Re: BUS: Legal Term

2010-05-04 Thread comex
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Proposal: Reassign the name (AI=1.7, II=1, Distributable) > {{{ > Amend each rule in numerical order by replacing each instance of REASSIGN > (case-sensitive) with REMIT. > }}} The only rule where this would have an effect is Rule 911. However,

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: (WARNING! Proposal 6716 may pass if you don't vote against/democratise it!) OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6713-6720

2010-05-04 Thread comex
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Charles Reiss wrote: >>> 6716  1   3.0  coppro     Purple   Dictatorship Scam >> AGAINST. I intend, with 2 support, to make the decision on whether to >> adopt this proposal Democratic; and if there are any other intents to do >> the same, I support them, and do so

DIS: Re: OFF: Whee!

2010-05-04 Thread Ed Murphy
coppro wrote: >A player's voting limit on an Agoran Decision is fixed at the >end of that Decision's voting period and thereafter CANNOT change, >rules to the contrary notwithstanding. I'd still prefer to fix it at the beginning of the voting period unless the voter retrac

DIS: Re: OFF: Whee!

2010-05-04 Thread Sean Hunt
On 05/04/2010 02:11 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: Proposal: Voting Cutbacks (AI=3, II=2, Distributable via fee) Oops, wrong forum, sorry -coppro

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 6713 - 6720

2010-05-04 Thread Sean Hunt
On 05/04/2010 01:36 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: coppro wrote: On 05/04/2010 07:35 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: 6713 OG0 3.0 Murphy Eliminate past repetitive wins PRESENT According to my records, you still have 2 rests from April 25, so your voting limit is 0. I only gave myself one. -coppro

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Read the Judicial Record week CFJs, part 1 (there may or may not be a part 2)

2010-05-04 Thread Ed Murphy
David Nicol wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Kerim Aydin > wrote: > > > logical system where CFJ(foo exists). Â It would mean that the CFJ > system > was just an implementation of (stop reading now) The Game. > > > http://www.imdb.com/title/

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 6713 - 6720

2010-05-04 Thread Ed Murphy
coppro wrote: > On 05/04/2010 07:35 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> 6713 OG0 3.0 Murphy Eliminate past repetitive wins > > PRESENT According to my records, you still have 2 rests from April 25, so your voting limit is 0.

DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 6713 - 6720

2010-05-04 Thread Sean Hunt
On 05/04/2010 07:35 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: Voting results for Proposals 6713 - 6720: H. Assessor, do you intend to resolve the Decisions for Proposals 6708-6712? -coppro

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Read the Judicial Record week CFJs, part 1 (there may or may not be a part 2)

2010-05-04 Thread David Nicol
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > logical system where CFJ(foo exists). It would mean that the CFJ system > was just an implementation of (stop reading now) The Game. > http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119174/ everyone here has seen this film, yes?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6713-6720

2010-05-04 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Ed Murphy wrote: > * The Senators were ais523, BobTHJ, comex, coppro, ehird, G., >Ienpw III, Murphy, Phoenix, Sgeo, Taral, Tiger, Warrigal, and >Yally (Registrar's report of April 25). Hrm, I'm a senator again? I'd better resign in disgust over something. Where's ehi

DIS: Re: BUS: Voting

2010-05-04 Thread Ed Murphy
Spitemaster wrote: > Proposal: Dictatorship Scam > FOR x 12 In future, please quote the proposal numbers.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6713-6720

2010-05-04 Thread Ed Murphy
coppro wrote: > In other news, I announce the ceremonial shilling of the palace. Oh yes, and R2154 restricts election candidates and voters to Senators during an emergency session.