DIS: Re: BUS: Stepping Down

2009-11-14 Thread Sean Hunt
comex wrote: On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: Proposal: Amethyst Card Repeal (AI=2, II=2) If it's II-2 can I be co-author? I'd say yes, but it repeals coauthor rewards, making it pointless, and I don't have another distrib-u-matic. -coppro

DIS: Re: BUS: Why not?

2009-11-14 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
2009/11/14 ais523 : > On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 13:29 -0700, Sean Hunt wrote: >> I play six Your Turn cards, specifying the following players: >> Murphy >> ais523 >> ehird >> BobTHJ >> Pavitra >> c. > > I play Distrib-U-Matic to make "This gets on my nerves" distributable. > (This counts as destroying

DIS: Re: BUS: [Anarchist] Repeal Proposal

2009-11-14 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > I play Distrib-u-Matics to make the following proposals Distributable: > Ratification of disclaimered documents > This gets on my nerves > Self-Ratifying Census > Free Parking > Stoma Moats of Atoms > Remove Stupid Report > > I submit the followi

DIS: Re: BUS: Bleh

2009-11-14 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > I deregister ə. > > -coppro > Can you do that?

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Deprioritize History

2009-11-14 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: >> Proposal: Deprioritize History (AI = 1, II = 1) > > I pledge to attempt to become Registrar as soon as possible after the > next time I register. > Again, the proposal doesn't el

DIS: Re: BUS: Why not?

2009-11-14 Thread Sean Hunt
ais523 wrote: On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 13:29 -0700, Sean Hunt wrote: I play six Your Turn cards, specifying the following players: Murphy ais523 ehird BobTHJ Pavitra c. I play Distrib-U-Matic to make "This gets on my nerves" distributable. (This counts as destroying a Distrib-U-Matic for the purp

DIS: I am bored.

2009-11-14 Thread James Beirne
So now my NEW NAME is Ienpw III. - yuri_dragon_17

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Report NoVs.

2009-11-14 Thread Sean Hunt
Ed Murphy wrote: c. wrote: I close this NoV. I play Absolv-o-Matic indicating myself as many times as I have rests. I'm interpreting this as "(I play Absolv-o-Matic indicating myself) as many times..." rather than "I play Absolv-o-Matic indicating (myself as many times..." as only a moro

DIS: Re: BUS: Report NoVs.

2009-11-14 Thread Ed Murphy
c. wrote: > I close this NoV. I play Absolv-o-Matic indicating myself as many > times as I have rests. I'm interpreting this as "(I play Absolv-o-Matic indicating myself) as many times..." rather than "I play Absolv-o-Matic indicating (myself as many times..." as only a moron in a hurry woul

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2731 assigned to c.

2009-11-14 Thread comex
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Wrong procedure.  This punishes the judge for your own mistake[...] My judicial rank would only decrease if the panel judged OVERRULE. No opinion on the week delay... -- -c.

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: let's shrink the ruleset...

2009-11-14 Thread Sean Hunt
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: 2009/11/9 Elliott Hird : 2009/11/9 Kerim Aydin : Hey c., If you don't propose and distribute those citrine repeals, I'll do it... let's get this ruleset shrunk (or at least propose it)! -G. i guess nobody is in a hurry to distribute *my* mass-repeal proposal huh :D

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2731 assigned to c.

2009-11-14 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/11/14 comex : >> UNDETERMINED per CFJ 1769. >> > Sorry, didn't think of this. It was all clear to me... I intend to > appeal this sentence with 2 support. I also submit the following as > evidence: Wrong procedure. This punishes the judge for yo

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: coppro's Random Change Deals.

2009-11-14 Thread Sean Hunt
Ed Murphy wrote: coppro wrote: H. CotC, H. Registrar, and H. Assessor, you each need to publish a list of draws earned last week (in the case of the Registrar and Assessor, I believe this is an empty list, but it nonetheless needs to be posted). Which rule requires this? For now, here's the