Proposal: Dealing Refactor (AI=?, II=3)
{{{
Amend Rule 2253 to read as follows:
{{
Cards are any class of assets defined by the Rules to be cards.
For the rules to define a class of assets to be a card, the
Rules must define its Title, its Deck, and one of: its Exploit,
its
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Becuase Wooble amended it to a contract imposing no obligations.
No I didn't; I amended it by adding on a mousetrap and an escape clause.
Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:22, Sean Hunt wrote:
I deregister the LNP.
Fails. The LNP is still a person for 7 days following c.'s departure.
BobTHJ
It is no longer a partnership regardless of whether c. is a party or not.
Why isn't it a p
coppro wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:22, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> I deregister the LNP.
>>>
>> Fails. The LNP is still a person for 7 days following c.'s departure.
>>
>> BobTHJ
> It is no longer a partnership regardless of whether c. is a party or not.
Why isn't it a part
Original Message
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [frc] Re: amicus curae
From: Ouroboros
To: Fantasy Rules Committee
This morning I received a package from the Library and Consolidated
Archives of the Fantasy Rules Committee, in response to a missive I
se
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:22, Sean Hunt wrote:
I deregister the LNP.
Fails. The LNP is still a person for 7 days following c.'s departure.
BobTHJ
It is no longer a partnership regardless of whether c. is a party or not.
-coppro
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 15:22, ais523 wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 16:20 -0500, pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Acting on behalf of AAA (if required): {
> The AAA isn't a person. First coppro trying to act on behalf of
> non-persons, now you; what is the world coming to?
>
Yeah, I noticed that, but
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 16:20 -0500, pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
> Acting on behalf of AAA (if required): {
The AAA isn't a person. First coppro trying to act on behalf of
non-persons, now you; what is the world coming to?
--
ais523
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 15:38 -0500, pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
> NOTE: Actions taken in this message are on behalf of BobTHJ and in
> turn may be on behalf of other recordkeepors and/or officers (as
> specified below) as permitted by the contracts Bob's Janitorial
> Service and The Dealership.
>
> A
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:22, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I deregister the LNP.
>
Fails. The LNP is still a person for 7 days following c.'s departure.
BobTHJ
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 19:01 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > I play Presto! on one of Walker's Discard Pickings.
> > I play Discard Picking to gain Presto!
> > I play Presto! on Walker's Discard Picking.
>
> I spent both of my Discard Pickings r
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> As of right now the way the rule is written gives the dealer
> performing the audit too much lee-way in determining who is audited
> (by transferring cards around in the same message as performing the
> audits).
As you are currently the only de
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> I play Presto! on one of Walker's Discard Pickings.
> I play Discard Picking to gain Presto!
> I play Presto! on Walker's Discard Picking.
I spent both of my Discard Pickings recently. I'm not sure if this
affects anything.
--
Charles Walker
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 13:51, Charles Walker
wrote:
> Suggestion: On nomic.bob-space.com, each player report includes that
> player's Hand Limit, total number of Cards owned from each Deck (and
> total number of cards owned overall), and number of Cards they are
> over their Hand Limit.
>
On the t
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:40, Alex Smith wrote:
> I intend to deputise for the dealer of each basic deck to audit the
> appropriate entities.
>
I totally forgot about thiscoming up shortly.
BobTHJ
15 matches
Mail list logo
