2009/8/23 Pavitra :
> Testing PGP/MIME for readability.
>
>
In Gmail, below the message there is a horizontal rule (not
full-width) and a text attachment available called signature.asc. It's
quite small and ignorable. I can view it with one click.
(I'm probably the one who complained about it bei
I wrote:
> Pavitra wrote:
>
>> Testing PGP/MIME for readability.
>
> Looks fine here (Thunderbird 2.0.0.23)
Clarification: the PGP stuff is not shown unless I select View Source;
I have not attempted to do anything else with it.
Pavitra wrote:
> Testing PGP/MIME for readability.
Looks fine here (Thunderbird 2.0.0.23)
c-walker wrote:
> * FINE with an amount of one class of asset, appropriate for
> rule breaches of small consequence. An amount is only valid
> if the currency's backing document binds the ninny or the
You may want to clarify Rule 2141's implication that the rules bind
all p
coppro wrote:
> You should also feel HUMILIATED if you didn't vote in this
> QUORUM-FAILING election! Especially if you missed the second, correct
> announcement and so got your vote dropped! HUMILIATION!
What was quorum for this election, and for the Tailor election, and
why? Based on recent pr
ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 17:03 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
>> Testing PGP/MIME for readability.
>
> What's your public key?
Obviously there's basically no security against a MITM attack here (the
Distributor is in a particularly good position to execute it, and is
known to be generally fam
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 17:03 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
> Testing PGP/MIME for readability.
What's your public key?
--
ais523
Pavitra wrote:
> Testing PGP/MIME for readability.
It looks the same as woggle's messages to me.
I seem to remember that I stopped using GPG with Agora because someone
complained that their MUA didn't strip out the machine-readable parts of
the message properly. How does this look to everyone els
Testing PGP/MIME for readability.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
9 matches
Mail list logo
