On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I think there's precedent that randomly high votes work fine (I suppose
> unless some critical threshold in the upper reaches makes a scam work).
> But it may be just that assessors haven't questioned it. In theory it
> may matter that a person
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, ais523 wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 17:25 -0400, comex wrote:
>> Precedent says 1 is too high, at least for CFJs :)
>
> Hmmm... because that creates extra recordkeepor burden?
>
I think there's precedent that randomly high votes work fine (I suppose
unless some critical
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 17:25 -0400, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:21 PM, ais523 wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, this correctly scams round loopholes in the
> > proposal's tricks; if the proposal would pass even with an AGAINST from
> > me, I have no votes AGAINST; and I have ten thousand
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:21 PM, ais523 wrote:
> As far as I can tell, this correctly scams round loopholes in the
> proposal's tricks; if the proposal would pass even with an AGAINST from
> me, I have no votes AGAINST; and I have ten thousand unconditional votes
> FOR, so I'm likely to win as a re
C-walker wrote:
>> 6447 O 0 1.0 coppro Terrible
> FOR * VL if it would cause me to win, AGAINST * VL otherwise
Just so you know, that's effectively an unconditional AGAINST vote; the
proposal was written to prevent this manner of stupid vote from functioning.
-coppro
comex wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:32 PM, comex wrote:
>> I play Distrib-u-Matic to make it distributable.
>
> I play Committee to make it undistributable.
> I play Debate-o-Matic to make it democratic.
>
Fails; it's not an ongoing decision.
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2009/8/19 Geoffrey Spear :
>> ...and so relies on the faulty assumption that people care enough
>> about imaginary scarce resources to take the sort of actions needed to
>> make a free market actually work. The utility of any asset gain in
>> Agora is us
2009/8/19 Geoffrey Spear :
> ...and so relies on the faulty assumption that people care enough
> about imaginary scarce resources to take the sort of actions needed to
> make a free market actually work. The utility of any asset gain in
> Agora is usually not worth the effort it takes to work out
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Elliott
> Hird wrote:
>> 2009/8/19 Sgeo :
>>> The system used by the guild "The Goods" in A Tale In The Desert is
>>> described in http://wiki.atitd.net/tale3/Guilds/The_Goods/FAQ/The_System
>>> . How would
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Elliott
Hird wrote:
> 2009/8/19 Sgeo :
>> The system used by the guild "The Goods" in A Tale In The Desert is
>> described in http://wiki.atitd.net/tale3/Guilds/The_Goods/FAQ/The_System
>> . How would a bank based on such a system work out in Agora?
>>
>
> Involves
2009/8/19 Sgeo :
> The system used by the guild "The Goods" in A Tale In The Desert is
> described in http://wiki.atitd.net/tale3/Guilds/The_Goods/FAQ/The_System
> . How would a bank based on such a system work out in Agora?
>
Involves the same player-correction as the PBA.
The system used by the guild "The Goods" in A Tale In The Desert is
described in http://wiki.atitd.net/tale3/Guilds/The_Goods/FAQ/The_System
. How would a bank based on such a system work out in Agora?
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> Taral wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Pavitra wrote:
>>> A player CAN play N Distrib-u-Matics to make an II(N-1) Undistributable
>>> proposal Distributable. E thereby becomes the proposal's sponsor. When a
>>> proposal becomes Undistribut
Charles Reiss wrote:
>> == CFJ 2666 ==
>>
>> This is to decide.
>>
>>
>
> I judge UNDETERMINED.
Oh come on. That was trivially TRUE.
14 matches
Mail list logo
