On 7/8/09 3:43 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
[snip]
> {{
> d) The rules explicitly state that it MAY be performed while
> certain conditions are satisfied. Except as allowed by the
> rules, performing such an action is a violation of the m
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Murphy ROGCBK MUVIY 11
How much would Murphy be willing to give me in order for me to name em
as my mentor?
Sean Hunt wrote:
> [This message is to test if SCHWA is handled correctly on the lists.
> It doesn't actually have a blue ribbon.]
Erk, forgot to change to discussion, not official. Sorry.
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Try sending these to yourself :)
Did that for a while; just making sure there wasn't anything with
the headers that agoranomic didn't like. -G.
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> [The following is a test. No action is implied].
>
> G. has requested that 10 cards from the deck of Government be dealt
> to em using the web request service described in the [not yet
> existing] Agoran Card Dealership (ACD) contract. If the Dealer of the
> Government deck i
[The following is a test. No action is implied].
G. has requested that 10 cards from the deck of Government be dealt
to em using the web request service described in the [not yet
existing] Agoran Card Dealership (ACD) contract. If the Dealer of the
Government deck is currently required to deal sa
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Benjamin
> Caplan wrote:
>> Oh come on. We assign powers and responsibilities to offices all the
>> time, and we've never required offices to be persons for it to work
>> before now. It makes perfect sense for the vote collector to
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Benjamin
Caplan wrote:
> comex wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
>>> Does it have to be exactly one /natural person/? Or can the vote
>>> collector be "the IADoP"?
>>
>> The IADoP is a natural person (or undefined)-- the vote collector
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> comex wrote:
>> I intend, without objection, to ratify the following incorrect document:
>> { The office of Grand Poobah is empty. There are no ongoing elections
>> for the office of Grand Poobah or decisions to determine a new
>> officeholder for that office. }
>>
>> The
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> Proposal 6397 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=0) by Pavitra
>>> Support Diplomacy
>> AGAINST, this defeats the purpose of the rule in the first place.
> Not really. The purpose of the rule in the first place is to prevent
> arbitrary creation of corporate
comex wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
>> Does it have to be exactly one /natural person/? Or can the vote
>> collector be "the IADoP"?
>
> The IADoP is a natural person (or undefined)-- the vote collector
> could, I suppose, theoretically be the *office* of IADoP, b
comex wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to ratify the following incorrect document:
> { The office of Grand Poobah is empty. There are no ongoing elections
> for the office of Grand Poobah or decisions to determine a new
> officeholder for that office. }
>
> The document is incorrect because
Charles Reiss wrote:
>> 6397 D 0 2.0 Pavitra Support Diplomacy
> AGAINST (should not be disinterested)
Um, what? "Should be disinterested" is a sensible enough reason to vote
AGAINST a proposal, because the author of a passing interested proposal
gets paid for it, but... /what/? Is ther
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Benjamin
Caplan wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>> For the purposes of this message, an encoding is any manner of
>> interpreting text, including the base character encoding and any
>> encodings layered on top of that.
>
> I think that "any manner of inte
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Benjamin
Caplan wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, ais523 wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 15:15 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I think what happens is that in R208, "exactly one collector...defaulting
to the initiator" forces the latter part of
Sean Hunt wrote:
> For the purposes of this message, an encoding is any manner of
> interpreting text, including the base character encoding and any
> encodings layered on top of that.
I think that "any manner of interpreting text" is too broad. It includes
things like the Englis
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, ais523 wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 15:15 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> I think what happens is that in R208, "exactly one collector...defaulting
>>> to the initiator" forces the latter part of the paragraph to not work when
>>> the office is vacant (some
Sean Hunt wrote:
> I retract my proposal entitled "That's Just Criminal" and submit the
> following:
I retract that proposal and submit the following:
Proposal (AI=3, II=3) That's Just Criminal
{{{
Amend Rule 2230 to read as follows:
{{
Any person CAN publish a document alleging that a sing
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> announcement if e done so less than 3 times in the same Agoran
Grammar.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Sgeo wrote:
> When I get around to it, I have a puzzle to submit..
*insert appropriate contract here*
I create a Round Tuit in Sgeo's possession.
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:02 AM, ais523 wrote:
> Again, no puzzles this week or last week. Come on, people; now point
> output has been reduced, points are more valuable than ever; and when
> nobody else is submitting puzzles, the potential rewards for them are
> larger (based on the new rules chan
21 matches
Mail list logo
