Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Benjamin
> Caplan wrote:
>> Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> Sean Hunt wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Parties to 3-Scroll Rodne
>> ais523
>> allispaul
>> BobTHJ
>> coppro
>> comex
>> c-walker
>> Osc
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Yally wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Maybe this is not applicable, but in the past I have announced an
intent to deregister a player before 3 months had passes and then
resol
Yally wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>>> Maybe this is not applicable, but in the past I have announced an
>>> intent to deregister a player before 3 months had passes and then
>>> resolved the action after 3 months had passed.
>> It is hardly
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Intents to perform actions can be announced early in this way, such
that I could announce my intent to make a n
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>>> Intents to perform actions can be announced early in this way, such
>>> that I could announce my intent to make a non-existant proposal
>>> distributable without objection,
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> Intents to perform actions can be announced early in this way, such
>> that I could announce my intent to make a non-existant proposal
>> distributable without objection, submit the proposal in th
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Also, as a courtesy, H. Conductor Tiger, would you publish an
> up-to-date Conductor's report between now and the resolution of the
> election?
E published an up-to-date report and published intent to resign,
remaining only to adress CoEs (of which there are none). At this
Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Benjamin
> Caplan wrote:
>> I intend, without objection, to add spoon-disc...@nomic.net as a
>> send-only address to agora-busin...@agoranomic.org.
>
>
> I object. If you explain why, I won't.
If I explain why, someone will certainly object.
2009/6/21 Sean Hunt :
> - I deregister the quoted text.
This is ineffective because the quoted text is presumably not a
player. I publish a NoV alleging that coppro violated the Power-2
Rule 2215 by making the above statement.
--
-c.
2009/6/21 Sean Hunt :
> I'm not sure exactly what happened up there, but:
>
> - I disfavor all CFJs initiated in the quoted text
> - I decline all nominations made in the quoted text
> - I object to all dependent actions intended in the quoted text
> - I support then withdraw support from all d
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Intents to perform actions can be announced early in this way, such
> that I could announce my intent to make a non-existant proposal
> distributable without objection, submit the proposal in the next four
> days, and then make it distributable (provide
2009/6/21 Craig Daniel :
> Perhaps gratuitously, I observe that as the digraph "ou" is not
> actually valid in Lojban, the name ".deivyd.sloud." (Warrigal's
> attempted Lojbanization of the name 'David slowed his pace slightly as
> his ears,") is malformed and thus under the contract's own
> self-a
Rodlen wrote:
>> Tue 9 Jun 05:22:38 Pavitra : Pavitra > "Rolden" (spelling)
>>
>
> I'm sorry, but I just have to do this:
>
> I CFJ on the following statement: Rodlen and Rolden are different players.
>
Gratuitous arguments: see CFJs 2575-6.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2582a
>
> Appeal 2582a
>
> Panelist: Yally
> Decision:
>
> Panelist:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Benjamin
Caplan wrote:
>
> NttPF.
>
It was to the B public forum, which is also where it was first
created; if this didn't work from Agora's perspective, then I believe
it was also not successfully created in the first place. I copied a-d
since there's been an att
Craig Daniel wrote:
> Having received no objections, I implement both of these changes. The
> contract now reads:
>
> {
> The name of this Partnership is the Bdi ta Askatasuna. Parties to this
[...]
> CAN cause the Bdi ta Askatasuna to nominate itself for that title.
> }
NttPF.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:01 PM, comex wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>> I nominate myself as Conductor. I pledge that any player can act on my
>> behalf to decline my nomination for Conductor provided the player so
>> acting has also been nominated as Conductor
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> coppro wrote:
>>
>>> Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> CoE: Each of those votes was cast 12 times. Proposal 6346 actually passed.
>>
>> Admitted. Those votes were cast in the following message:
>> http://ww
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> coppro wrote:
>
>> Ed Murphy wrote:
>> CoE: Each of those votes was cast 12 times. Proposal 6346 actually passed.
>
> Admitted. Those votes were cast in the following message:
> http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/200
ais523 wrote:
> So the question here is, does the current concept of Caste fit
> sufficiently with the old concept of the Oligarchy that it allows us to
> define "Oligarch" sufficiently well to define "marvy"? Instead of having
> one distinction (oligarch vs. non-oligarch), we now have 5 (alpha, b
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
>
> I intend, without objection from any other parties (which would be me,
> C-Walker, and I think that's it at the moment, unless I overlooked
> something) to amend Parti Bois by replacing every instance of the
> string "Parti Bois" therein with
21 matches
Mail list logo
