Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A wisp of vapor escapes the fountain...

On 6/16/09 6:55 PM, Paul VanKoughnett wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > >> Paul VanKoughnett wrote: >> >>> I agree to the following: >>> { >>> This is a Public Legalistic contract and a pledge, called Three Coins. >>> Parties to Three Coins are called Marvy. For

DIS: Re: Fwd: BUS: Win by Paradox

Rodlen wrote: > I CFJ on the following sentence. CFJ 2543 is a tortoise. I bar coppro > and Yally from judging this case. The second of these fails. (The initiator of a case used to be able to disqualify up to three other players; I don't remember why it was changed, maybe because there were few

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registering on behalf

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Craig Daniel wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Warrigal wrote: >> 2009/6/16 Elliott Hird >>> 2009/6/16 Taral : >>> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Elliott >>> > Hird wrote: >>> >> NOTE: this is scripted. Myndzi replies to all actions like that. No >>> >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registering on behalf

No; e is merely vaguely annoying. If you say \o/ it draws the rest of a stick body. On 2009-06-17, Craig Daniel wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Elliott Hird > wrote: >> >> 2009/6/16 Taral : >> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Elliott >> > Hird wrote: >> >> NOTE: this is scripted. Myn

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registering on behalf

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Warrigal wrote: > 2009/6/16 Elliott Hird >> 2009/6/16 Taral : >> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Elliott >> > Hird wrote: >> >> NOTE: this is scripted. Myndzi replies to all actions like that. No >> >> consent was involved. >> > >> > I'd say consent was involved

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A wisp of vapor escapes the fountain...

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Paul VanKoughnett wrote: >> I agree to the following: >> { >> This is a Public Legalistic contract and a pledge, called Three Coins. >> Parties to Three Coins are called Marvy.  For the purposes of Three >> Coins, to Dance means to cast exactly on

DIS: Re: BUS: Win by Paradox

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Rodlen wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Rodlen > Date: Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:44 PM > Subject: Re: BUS: Win by Paradox > To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org > > > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: >> >> >> On

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registering on behalf

2009/6/16 Elliott Hird > 2009/6/16 Taral : > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Elliott > > Hird wrote: > >> NOTE: this is scripted. Myndzi replies to all actions like that. No > >> consent was involved. > > > > I'd say consent was involved in the writing of a script. > > > > -- > > Taral > > "Pl

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registering on behalf

Craig Daniel wrote: > Presumably the person involved was designing the script to be able to > be used for strange things. I'd say consent is involved. > > Question, though: is myndzi's programmer a player? myndzi is a real person. The script was running on eir personal client.

DIS: Re: BUS: Win by Paradox

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > >> Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> > This post is a win announcement. CFJ 2543, as ruled by H. Judge BobTHJ, >> > is a tortoise and has been so continuously for the previous two weeks, >> > b

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registering on behalf

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: > > 2009/6/16 Taral : > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Elliott > > Hird wrote: > >> NOTE: this is scripted. Myndzi replies to all actions like that. No > >> consent was involved. > > > > I'd say consent was involved in the writing of a scrip

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registering on behalf

2009/6/16 Taral : > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Elliott > Hird wrote: >> NOTE: this is scripted. Myndzi replies to all actions like that. No >> consent was involved. > > I'd say consent was involved in the writing of a script. > > -- > Taral > "Please let me know if there's any further troubl

DIS: Re: BUS: A testing subject

Sean Hunt wrote: > Alex Smith wrote: >> What about its Sentiment? Test Subject doesn't purport to have any >> Sentiment in particular, so R2198 doesn't apply. As far as I can tell, >> no rule other than R2162 has set its Sentiment in this situation; and so >> R2162 fires, changing the switch from h

DIS: Re: BUS: proposal: 1050 Cleanup

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > It can. Power-3 and higher entities are not restricted in actions. > > I intend, without objection, to make the change described in c-walker's > proposal. You have a few days left to do this. -- C-walker, who intends, without objection

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] Y'know, B Nomic doesn't have any second-class persons...

teucer wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> I object. Change the name plz. >> > > Would you, perhaps, prefer Bdi ta Asatasuna? Very much so.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] Y'know, B Nomic doesn't have any second-class persons...

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > > I object.  Change the name plz. > Would you, perhaps, prefer Bdi ta Asatasuna?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Distributability test

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > Is this even possible? Does the "permitted" in the sentence "if no > other player is permitted to distribute a proposal, anyone can without > three objections" mean can or may? It means MAY, but combined with "A player specifically permitt

DIS: Re: BUS: Distributability test

2009/6/16 Alex Smith > > On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 12:39 +0100, Alex Smith wrote: > > I submit the following proposal (II=3, Title="A Terrible Proposal"): > > > > Create a rule with the following text: > > {{{ > > Any set of persons who between them have at least 10 instances of the > > patent ti

DIS: Re: BUS: Inflation

Sean Hunt wrote: > Proposal, AI=1, II=0, title=inflation > {{{ > In rule 2138's text, replace each instance of "International" with > "Intergalactic" and then do the same replacement on the Rule's title. > }}} Intergalactic Allmighty Ordinatorus Personali. (We should have a Creative Office whose p

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] Y'know, B Nomic doesn't have any second-class persons...

C-walker wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Craig Daniel > wrote: > > I agree to the following contract: > > { > The name of this Partnership is the Parti Bois. Parties to this > contract SHALL NOT act in a way detrimental to the prospect of >

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] Y'know, B Nomic doesn't have any second-class persons...

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:41 AM, C-walker wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> >> I object in Agora. >> >> I'm pretty sure you can't get Agoran Consent in B, but in case this is >> a valid synonym for B's equivalent, I object there too.  By the way, B >> doesn't curre

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [s-b] Y'know, B Nomic doesn't have any second-class persons...

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > > I'm pretty sure you can't get Agoran Consent in B, but in case this is > a valid synonym for B's equivalent, I object there too.  By the way, B > doesn't currently allow non-first-class judges; the Agora amendment > happened after the rule

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registering on behalf

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Elliott Hird wrote: > NOTE: this is scripted. Myndzi replies to all actions like that. No > consent was involved. I'd say consent was involved in the writing of a script. -- Taral "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Activity, Please

Can you blame me? You've been inflating quorum for no purpose for months. On 2009-06-16, Christian Julius wrote: > Temper... > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Elliott Hird < > penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Jesus F'in Christ. You'd better. >> >> On 2009-06-16, Christian Julius

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Activity, Please

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 07:44, Elliott Hird wrote: > Jesus F'in Christ. You'd better. > I transfer a P*** from E to for the use of l** BobTHJ

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Activity, Please

Temper... On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Elliott Hird < penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Jesus F'in Christ. You'd better. > > On 2009-06-16, Christian Julius wrote: > > I object. > > Planning to vote this time > > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Aaron Goldfein > > wrote: > > > >

DIS: Re: BUS: Activity, Please

Jesus F'in Christ. You'd better. On 2009-06-16, Christian Julius wrote: > I object. > Planning to vote this time > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: > >> I intend, without objection, to make Siege inactive. >> >> I pledge that if Siege objects to the above intent, I will

DIS: Re: BUS: Registering on behalf

NOTE: this is scripted. Myndzi replies to all actions like that. No consent was involved. On 2009-06-16, Alex Smith wrote: > An excerpt from the logs of irc://irc.freenode.net:6667/#esoteric: >> [05:35] * ais523 agrees to the following contract with myndzi, binding >> under the rules of Agora: {{

DIS: Re: BUS: Distributability test

> I intend, without /three/ objections, to make this proposal > distributable. Umm, how?

DIS: Re: BUS: A wisp of vapor escapes the fountain...

Paul VanKoughnett wrote: > I agree to the following: > { > This is a Public Legalistic contract and a pledge, called Three Coins. > Parties to Three Coins are called Marvy. For the purposes of Three > Coins, to Dance means to cast exactly one valid vote on an Agoran > decision, and a Powerful Danc