On Fri, 22 May 2009, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I change my nickname to Gravity Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck
>> e^(-kt).
>
> ...
>
> I change my name to Confusion Arises from Sufficiently Entropy-Infused
> Nickname Permutation Overwhelming Initial Nickname Transpa
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I change my nickname to Gravity Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck
> e^(-kt).
...
I change my name to Confusion Arises from Sufficiently Entropy-Infused
Nickname Permutation Overwhelming Initial Nickname Transparency
(CASEINPOINT).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPG
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Benjamin Caplan
wrote:
> "[T]he ratified document was completely true and accurate _at the time
> it was published_."
"The gamestate is modified so that". Effects are limited to modifying
the gamestate in some way.
On Fri, 22 May 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> However, one interesting point here is
> whether it's rule 106 or the proposal enacting the rules; it seems very
> clear that it's the proposal itself (especially because it's the
> proposal's power that matters to enact the rules), and interestingly,
> the
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Due to the report's ratification, our current gamestate takes that
> report to have been accurate, so the act cannot have been illegal.
"Nevertheless, the ratification of a
public document does not invalidate, reverse, alter, or cancel
Rule 1551/12 (Power=3)
Ratification
A public document is part (possibly all) of a public message.
When a public document is ratified, the gamestate is modified so
that the ratified document was completely true and accurate at
the time it was published. Nevertheless, the r
N.B. the ruleset has been ratified, but I'm not sure we haven't missed
knock-on effects to the gamestate. I think we still need a "R1482
never contained that text" ratification.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 22, 2009, at 5:21 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
These are only of academic interest now we'
Gratuitous: this CFJ asks about the past gamestate, not a current
gamestate which may or may not contain ratified elements.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 22, 2009, at 5:49 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Ed Murphy
wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcas
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 12:25 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Wooble wrote:
>
> > I award myself the patent title Champion for my win by Championship.
> > I award myself the patent title Champion for my win by High Score.
>
> In the interest of maintaining the Hall of Fame's historical
> records (and my
Wooble wrote:
> I award myself the patent title Champion for my win by Championship.
> I award myself the patent title Champion for my win by High Score.
In the interest of maintaining the Hall of Fame's historical
records (and my not having to hunt through the archives again),
what was the natur
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 09:32 -0400, Quazie wrote:
> Wooble is how i vote.
Lowercase i? Are you gwen in disguise?
--
ais523
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> If any of the following actions are invalid, I perform none of them:
[...]
> I harvest 1030 (recently-mutated rule, using X crops as necessary), with
> a 2 (or an X, with 2 as the Seed), to create a 2 Ranch.
This would transform a 2 ranch into
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> >> I initiate an Agoran decision to decide the holder of the Registrar
> >> office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector
> >> is the IADoP, and the o
13 matches
Mail list logo
