On Sun, 17 May 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
> coppro wrote:
> Announcements are not generally required to be explicit, e.g. "FOR" is
> routinely accepted as a gloss for "I vote FOR the decision on whether to
> adopt the above-indicated proposal".
>
Semantics, but I'd argue that the above example is exp
coppro wrote:
> Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2528
>>
>> == CFJ 2528 ==
>>
>> On or about Sat, 16 May 2009 20:15:44 -0500, Yally resolved the
>> Agoran decision to decide the holder of
Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2528
>
> == CFJ 2528 ==
>
> On or about Sat, 16 May 2009 20:15:44 -0500, Yally resolved the
> Agoran decision to decide the holder of the IADoP office.
>
Ed Murphy wrote:
> Couple of misspellings. Recommend replacing the whole thing with
> something like:
>
> An officer SHALL fulfill the duties of eir office. However, if e
> violates this requirement within one week after coming to hold
> the office, then DISCHARGE is the only a
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 16:50 -0700, Taral wrote:
>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Aaron Goldfein
>> wrote:
>> > Proposal: Legislative Dominance (AI = 2)
>>
>> I pledge to vote AGAINST this proposal.
>>
>> (As a note: If it passes, I will not
Wooble wrote:
> I revoke 3 points from Murphy.
> I create a mill with an operator of / in Murphy's possession.
I bought a Digit Ranch this week, not a Mill. (I bought a Mill last
week, and already got it.)
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> I feel generous and give Tom (who has no ranches) a 3, a 4, a 5, and an 8.
I'm treating this as too ambiguous to succeed; was this intended to
transfer ranches or crops?
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 18:51 -0400, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> I offer ais523 a trade of my 4s for eir 9s
I'm happy to trade up to half of the 9s I own to you in exchange for an
equal number of 4s.
I'll give you a pledge to this effect if you want, but I'm catching up
on the Notary's report atm and
ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 20:06 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:
>> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Ed Murphy
>> wrote:
>>
>> coppro wrote:
>>
>> > Alex Smith wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 23:55 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> 6310 D
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 20:06 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Ed Murphy
> wrote:
>
> coppro wrote:
>
> > Alex Smith wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 23:55 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> 6310 D 1 2.0 coppro
coppro wrote:
> A player holds an office if e is that office's holder.
IMO this is sufficiently covered by R754(2).
> If an office incurs and obligation, then the officer SHOULD act to
> ensure that the office meets those obligations. If an office
> incurs a penalty as a
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 12:42 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
> If the above is a proposal, I retract it.
> (now that's a new NttPF!)
It's written "NttDF" on occasion, to parallel with "NttPF". It's
actually a case I don't know of; saying in the body of a message that
something's a proto prevents it being a
Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 23:55 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> 6310 D 1 2.0 coppro Maple Leaf Dominance
>> PRESENT (I will inform Prime Minster Stephen Harper at p...@pm.gc.ca
>> if this passes; neither Queen Elizabeth II nor Governor General
>> Michaëlle Jean appears to b
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 23:55 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > 6310 D 1 2.0 coppro Maple Leaf Dominance
> PRESENT (I will inform Prime Minster Stephen Harper at p...@pm.gc.ca
> if this passes; neither Queen Elizabeth II nor Governor General
> Michaëlle Jean appears to be reachable by e-mail)
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 1:51 PM, comex wrote:
>> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Aaron Goldfein
>>> wrote:
I resolve the Agoran decision to decide the holder of the IADoP office.
>>> CoE: this resolution is
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 1:51 PM, comex wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Aaron Goldfein
>> wrote:
>>> I resolve the Agoran decision to decide the holder of the IADoP office.
>>
>> CoE: this resolution is INVALID as there are two
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>> I resolve the Agoran decision to decide the holder of the IADoP office.
>
> CoE: this resolution is INVALID as there are two or more valid options
> and the voting period has not
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:02 PM, comex wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 16 May 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> >> The votes for IADoP are as follows:
> >
> > I vote for Yally for IADoP. -Goethe
>
> I vote for Human Point Two.
>
This election has alr
comex wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> comex wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
comex wrote:
>> 6310 D 1 2.0 coppro Maple Leaf Dominance
> AGAINST, grammatically incorrect ("it's" vs "its") and despite the AI
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
