On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:46 AM, Taral wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > Or we could just... you know... change the quorum rules.
>
> Or the activity rules. In B nomic, one is only "active" in a sense if
> one has voted in the previous week.
>
> --
> Taral
>
Taral wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>> Or we could just... you know... change the quorum rules.
>
> Or the activity rules. In B nomic, one is only "active" in a sense if
> one has voted in the previous week.
Not any more; their latest emergency procedure end
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Or we could just... you know... change the quorum rules.
No, too dangerous the other way. Better way is to penalize
for repeated non-votes (e.g. current proposal to make non-voters
inactive). Better would be rests for active players who don't
vote
Oh god call me when it's over
On 2009-05-16, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> Siege wrote:
>> Taral wrote:
>>> Siege wrote:
coppro wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to put Siege on hold.
> >>>
I object.
>>>
>>> It's been two weeks. Still hasn't done anything except cause the
>>> quorum
Why?
On 2009-05-16, Christian Julius wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Taral wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Christian Julius
>> wrote:
>> > Sean Hunt wrote:
>> >>I intend, without objection, to put Siege on hold.
>> > I object.
>>
>> It's been two weeks. Still hasn't done
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Or we could just... you know... change the quorum rules.
Or the activity rules. In B nomic, one is only "active" in a sense if
one has voted in the previous week.
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> This ambiguous. Alphabetical order by what? Election title? Nickname?
> Nicknames aren't even officially tracked.
Bah, spoilsport. :D
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Taral wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > The votes for Janitor are as follows:
>
> In all currently open elections, I vote for the first candidate (in
> alphabetical order) who has at least as many unconditional votes as
> any o
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Benjamin Caplan <
celestialcognit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Siege wrote:
>
>> Taral wrote:
>>
>>> Siege wrote:
>>>
coppro wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to put Siege on hold.
>
>>>
>
>> I object.
>>>
>>> It's been two weeks. Still h
Siege wrote:
Taral wrote:
Siege wrote:
coppro wrote:
I intend, without objection, to put Siege on hold.
>>>
I object.
It's been two weeks. Still hasn't done anything except cause the
quorum to be higher than necessary.
I intend, without objection, to make Siege inactive.
I object.
Sie
Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> Create a new power-1 rule reading as follows:
>>> {{
>>> The Herald SHALL, as soon as possible after the enactment of this
>>> rule, initiate an Agoran Decision to award ais523 a degree for eir
Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> Create a new power-1 rule reading as follows:
>>> {{
>>> The Herald SHALL, as soon as possible after the enactment of this
>>> rule, initiate an Agoran Decision to award ais523 a degree for eir
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > I resolve the Agoran decision to decide the holder of the Registrar
> office.
> >
> > The votes are as follows:
> >
> > Wooble (10): comex, Human Point Two[1], Murphy, Pavitra, P
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Create a new power-1 rule reading as follows:
>> {{
>> The Herald SHALL, as soon as possible after the enactment of this
>> rule, initiate an Agoran Decision to award ais523 a degree for eir
>> thesis on the
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> No I think the difference is that "days" as in span from an event
>> are 24 hours from the event. -G.
>
> That's the difference between a span and an epoch, though, not between
> "days" and "Agor
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> No I think the difference is that "days" as in span from an event
>> are 24 hours from the event. -G.
>
> That's the difference between a span and an epoch, though, not between
> "days" and "Agoran days". An "Agoran
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> No I think the difference is that "days" as in span from an event
> are 24 hours from the event. -G.
That's the difference between a span and an epoch, though, not between
"days" and "Agoran days". An "Agoran day" is 24 hours, excluding lea
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> You are correct. However, the answer to "Do we need to consider the
>> difference between regular and Agoran days?" is yes.
>
> The only difference is that regular days start at midnight local time,
Quazie wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:21 AM, comex wrote:
>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
While I'm all for a re-election, I don't think that failure to report
or perhaps notice a conditional circula
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:21 AM, comex wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> While I'm all for a re-election, I don't think that failure to report
>>> or perhaps notice a conditional circularity (when lack of ci
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> While I'm all for a re-election, I don't think that failure to report
>> or perhaps notice a conditional circularity (when lack of circularity
>> would have made it above quorum) is a s
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> You are correct. However, the answer to "Do we need to consider the
> difference between regular and Agoran days?" is yes.
The only difference is that regular days start at midnight local time,
which gives at least 6 different times for the cur
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> While I'm all for a re-election, I don't think that failure to report
> or perhaps notice a conditional circularity (when lack of circularity
> would have made it above quorum) is a sign of malice.
The fact that e retracted eir own vote for em
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>> Note: Arnold Bros (est. 1905) and coppro voted in conditional circularity.
>>
>> Votes: 10
>> Quorum: 11
>>
>> FAILED QUORUM is selected by Agora.
>
> I love how this was conveniently not men
24 matches
Mail list logo
