DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Emergency Distribution 6271 - 6272

Tiger wrote: >> I vote FORx2 on both of these. Your caste is 3 now.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Emergency Distribution 6271 - 6272

Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/5/6 Sean Hunt : >> For each of the following proposals, I initiate an Agoran Decision on >> whether to adopt the proposal. If any of the listed proposals are not in >> the Proposal Pool and are authored by myself, I first submit them. >> The valid options for these dec

DIS: Re: BUS: [IADoP] Herald Election

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/5/6 Kerim Aydin : >> >> On Tue, 5 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: >>> Aaron Goldfein wrote: I initiate an Agoran decision to choose the holder of the Herald office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector >>>

DIS: Re: OFF: Emergency Distribution 6271 - 6272

2009/5/6 Sean Hunt : > For each of the following proposals, I initiate an Agoran Decision on > whether to adopt the proposal. If any of the listed proposals are not in > the Proposal Pool and are authored by myself, I first submit them. > The valid options for these decisions are FOR, PRESENT, and

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Emergency Distribution 6271 - 6272

Dvorak Herring wrote: > 6271 Fixing contestmaster flipping O 1.0 1 Tiger > > FOR > > 6272 Revert contest bug O 1.0 1 coppro > > FOR Ineffective, your caste was recently decreased to Savage.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [IADoP] Anarchist Election

Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Sean Hunt > wrote: > > Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > I initiate an Agoran decision to choose the holder of the Anarchist > > office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector >

DIS: Re: BUS: [IADoP] Anarchist Election

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > I initiate an Agoran decision to choose the holder of the Anarchist > > office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector > > is the IADoP, and the candidates are Tiger, Quazie, and coppro. > I endor

DIS: More invasion thoughts

Making it so that only one new person a day can register might slow down invasions. Perhaps making it so that only 2 people can register in any given block of two consecutive days might also help in the case that two people happen to try to register in one day. Classification scheme for invasion s

DIS: Re: BUS: The point-generator contest

On 2009-05-06, Rodlen wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Sgeo wrote: > >> > I cease to agree to that. >> > I re-agree to that, but with "All parties to this contest consent to be >> > its contestmaster" appended. >> >> I agree to this. >> > > I agree to this as well. And cease to agree to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Contest: Lottery

2009/5/5 Rodlen : > I join this nice little contract. > > -- > --Rodlen > nttpf

DIS: Re: BUS: Contest: Lottery

I join this nice little contract. -- --Rodlen

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2436 assigned to Rodlen

On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 15:27 -0700, Rodlen wrote: > Hmm...actually, because Comex was judged as not guilty, we probably > shouldn't punish him...but the PNP probably deserves something for > reputation damage... > > Suggestions? comex is currently not a PerlNomicite, and has stated e doesn't plan

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2436 assigned to Rodlen

2009/5/5 Rodlen : > Hmm...actually, because Comex was judged as not guilty, we probably > shouldn't punish him...but the PNP probably deserves something for > reputation damage... People disliked the PNP as promotor anyway; this was just the last straw. I'd just enter the empty judgement.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2436 assigned to Rodlen

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Elliott Hird < penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > 2009/5/5 Rodlen : > > I somehow end up with this one. Heh. > > > > Well, this is going to be tough. > > > > How does kicking Comex out of the PNP for a few months sound to you all? > > > > -- > > --Rodlen > >

DIS: Re: BUS: Fixing that bug

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > I submit the following proposal, named "Fixing contestmaster > flipping", with AI=1, II=1 > (( > Amend the sentence in rule 2136 now reading: > ( > A contract's contestmaster CAN be flipped by any player without 3 >      objections, or as sp

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Close the contest loophole

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: >>      A contract's contestmaster CAN be flipped by any player without 3 >>      objections if it is null, or as specified by the contract if it is >>      non-null. I don't like this one so much. WO3O should always be available, in case the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Two ratification proposals

2009/5/5 Taral : > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:48 AM, comex wrote: >> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Elliott Hird >> wrote: Sent from a device with power 1 >>> CoE: nope >> >> Denied. > > 1. I'm not sure it's a valid CoE. > 2. You can't deny a CoE on someone else's document. > > -- > Taral >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Office Report

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Yally wrote: > > > Does not include reports or duties. I nominate myself, Wooble, and > > Goethe as IaDoP. > > > > > > Do you really need me to list that? It's already in the rules. It's not > > like any officer is going to look at my re

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Second-class judges

Sgeo wrote: > On 5/5/09, Ed Murphy wrote: >> Proposal: Second-class judges >> (AI = 2, please) >> >> [Now that second-class registration is restricted, other restrictions >> can be loosened up.] >> >> Amend Rule 1868 (Judge Assignment Generally) by removing "first-class" >> from this text:

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nomic Wars - Contest

On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 14:06 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > BobTHJ wrote: > > > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 14:13, Jonatan Kilhamn > > wrote: > >> I agree to Nomic Wars III. > >> > > I flip the contestmaster of Nomic Wars III to BobTHJ. > > I don't think this works; the condition was written along the lin

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Close the contest loophole

2009/5/5 Ed Murphy : > Proposal:  Close the contest loophole > (II = 0, please) > > Amend Rule 2136 (Contests) by replacing this text: > >      A contract's contestmaster CAN be flipped by any player without 3 >      objections, or as specified by the contract. > > with this text: > >      A contra

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Office Report

Yally wrote: > Does not include reports or duties. I nominate myself, Wooble, and > Goethe as IaDoP. > > > Do you really need me to list that? It's already in the rules. It's not > like any officer is going to look at my report for how to do his job anyway. The list of reports used to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Two ratification proposals

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:48 AM, comex wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Elliott Hird > wrote: >>> Sent from a device with power 1 >> CoE: nope > > Denied. 1. I'm not sure it's a valid CoE. 2. You can't deny a CoE on someone else's document. -- Taral "Please let me know if there's any

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Pruning

On 5/5/09, Alex Smith wrote: > On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 11:18 -0600, Sam Benner wrote: > > I vote for this proposal. > > > It hasn't been distributed yet; wait until the Promotor publishes a > distribution of proposals, then you can vote on it. (It's more > convenient voting on a distribution than

DIS: Re: BUS: Nomic Wars - Contest

BobTHJ wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 14:13, Jonatan Kilhamn > wrote: >> I agree to Nomic Wars III. >> > I flip the contestmaster of Nomic Wars III to BobTHJ. I don't think this works; the condition was written along the lines of "If this contract is a contest and its contestmaster is null", w

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Office Report

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/5/5 Aaron Goldfein : > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:25 PM, comex wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein > > >> wrote: > >> > IADoP's Office Report > >> > >> Does not include reports or duties. I nominat

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Second-class judges

On 5/5/09, Ed Murphy wrote: > Proposal:  Second-class judges > (AI = 2, please) > > [Now that second-class registration is restricted, other restrictions > can be loosened up.] > > Amend Rule 1868 (Judge Assignment Generally) by removing "first-class" > from this text: > >      The entities

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Office Report

2009/5/5 Aaron Goldfein : > > > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:25 PM, comex wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein >> wrote: >> > IADoP's Office Report >> >> Does not include reports or duties.  I nominate myself, Wooble, and >> Goethe as IaDoP. > > Do you really need me to list th

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Office Report

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:25 PM, comex wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: > > IADoP's Office Report > > Does not include reports or duties. I nominate myself, Wooble, and > Goethe as IaDoP. > Do you really need me to list that? It's already in the rules. It's not l

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nomic Wars - Contest

2009/5/5 Roger Hicks : > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 14:39, Elliott Hird > wrote: >> 2009/5/5 Roger Hicks : >>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 14:13, Jonatan Kilhamn >>> wrote: I agree to Nomic Wars III. >>> I flip the contestmaster of Nomic Wars III to BobTHJ. >>> >>> BobTHJ >>> >> >> How? >> > Pe

DIS: Re: BUS: The point-generator contest

2009/5/5 Alex Smith : > On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 21:43 +0100, Alex Smith wrote: >> A bug in rule 2136: >> {{{ >>       A contract's contestmaster CAN be flipped by any player without 3 >>       objections, or as specified by the contract. >> }}} >> [That read "contest's" a while back, it must have bee

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nomic Wars - Contest

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 14:39, Elliott Hird wrote: > 2009/5/5 Roger Hicks : >> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 14:13, Jonatan Kilhamn >> wrote: >>> I agree to Nomic Wars III. >>> >> I flip the contestmaster of Nomic Wars III to BobTHJ. >> >> BobTHJ >> > > How? > Per R2136: { A contract's contestmaster CAN

DIS: Re: BUS: Nomic Wars - Contest

2009/5/5 Roger Hicks : > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 14:13, Jonatan Kilhamn > wrote: >> I agree to Nomic Wars III. >> > I flip the contestmaster of Nomic Wars III to BobTHJ. > > BobTHJ > How?

DIS: Re: BUS: Nomic Wars - Contest

2009/5/5 Roger Hicks : > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 14:13, Jonatan Kilhamn > wrote: >> I agree to Nomic Wars III. >> > I flip the contestmaster of Nomic Wars III to BobTHJ. > > BobTHJ > First you intend to do so, without 3 objections. Easier is perhaps to amend the contract to let you flip it by anno

Re: DIS: Proto-contest: Red November

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Benjamin Caplan wrote: >> 46-60 minutes, depending on the number of gnomes.  The board image >> linked to in the appendix has the time track running around the edge >> of the board. > > It would be good to have this explicit, probably in paragraph 5. Okay, I'll add

DIS: Re: BUS: Nomic Wars - Contest

On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 14:34 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 14:13, Jonatan Kilhamn > wrote: > > I agree to Nomic Wars III. > > > I flip the contestmaster of Nomic Wars III to BobTHJ. Ugh, someone introduced a bug into R2136. (/me blames Murphy, I think it was em.) -- ais523

DIS: Re: BUS: Nomic Wars - Contest

On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 14:01 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: > I agree to the below referenced agreement (Nomic Wars III), which > becomes a public contract once someone else agrees to it. > > I intend, without two objections, to create a medal in the possession > of Nomic Wars III. Incidentally, you sh

Re: DIS: Proto-contest: Red November

Ian Kelly wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Quazie wrote: >> Also, how many minutes does each gnome start with? �Is there some >> representation of the track? > > 46-60 minutes, depending on the number of gnomes. The board image > linked to in the appendix has the time track running arou

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2495 assigned to Tiger

On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 12:37 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > Pavitra wrote: > > > I disagree, and I not-support the intent. Judge comex assigned judgement > > on time, thus making the judgement an on-time judgement; Murphy then > > published that on-time judgement by (re)posting it to a public forum. > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2495 assigned to Tiger

Pavitra wrote: > I disagree, and I not-support the intent. Judge comex assigned judgement > on time, thus making the judgement an on-time judgement; Murphy then > published that on-time judgement by (re)posting it to a public forum. > The judgement does not become late simply by Murphy's quoting i

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2495 assigned to Tiger

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this.  "On-time" is arguably > meaningless outside the context of the player required to publish > the judgement.  (The CotC's "X judged Y by Z" messages to a-o are > not part of eir duties, merely game custom.)

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2495 assigned to Tiger

Ed Murphy wrote: > Tiger wrote: > >> I judge TRUE, publishing is clearly done by submitting them to a public >> forum. > > I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this. "On-time" is arguably > meaningless outside the context of the player required to publish > the judgement. (The CotC's "X judged

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2495 assigned to Tiger

2009/5/5 Ed Murphy : > Tiger wrote: > >> I judge TRUE, publishing is clearly done by submitting them to a public >> forum. > > I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this.  "On-time" is arguably > meaningless outside the context of the player required to publish > the judgement.  (The CotC's "X judge

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2495 assigned to Tiger

2009/5/5 Ed Murphy : > Tiger wrote: > >> I judge TRUE, publishing is clearly done by submitting them to a public >> forum. > > I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this.  "On-time" is arguably > meaningless outside the context of the player required to publish > the judgement.  (The CotC's "X judge

Re: DIS: Proto-contest: Red November

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Quazie wrote: > What if the room connected by the open hatch is at high water and the > other is at low water?  No change? No change, there's no medium water state. > Also, how many minutes does each gnome start with?  Is there some > representation of the track?

Re: DIS: Proto-contest: Red November

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > I am having serious trouble figuring out what happens here if multiple > gnomes abandon their comrades, and the sub is lost. The phrasing used in the original rules is that a gnome who abandons has eir winning conditions reversed, which would i

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i register

2009/5/5 Geoffrey Spear : > evidence: e's *still* subscribed digested: > http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/roster/agora-business > eir subscription never worked.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Office Report

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:25 PM, comex wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: >> IADoP's Office Report > > Does not include reports or duties.  I nominate myself, Wooble, and > Goethe as IaDoP. > I nominate Human Point Two

Re: DIS: Proto-contest: Red November

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: > 9. A gnome's sequence of movement consists of one or more iterations >   of the following steps: > >   a. Spend one minute to Open an unblocked hatch attached to the room >      the gnome is in. > >   b. If one of the rooms connected by the open h

Re: DIS: Proto-contest: Red November

On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 12:20 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: > 19. If no surviving gnome has any minutes remaining, and the sub has > not been lost, then all surviving gnomes who have not abandoned > their comrades win the game. > > 20. A gnome who abandons eir comrades wins if all other gnomes los

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2482a assigned to root, Pavitra, Goethe, coppro, Wooble

On Tue, 5 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > I don't believe I can change my opinion after publishing it, but I'd > be fine with OVERRULE to IRRELEVANT or FALSE. With 3/5 opinions locked in, the only options unless the panel acts unanimously are REASSIGN, AFFIRM (no error rating), or (by default)

Re: DIS: Proto-contest: Red November

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: > Proto-contest: Red November > > 1. This is a public contract called Red November.  This contract is >   intended to be a contest.  The contestmaster CAN add the Y axis to >   and remove any other axis from this contract by announcement. > > 2. A c

Re: DIS: Invasions and Terrible Proposals

ais523 wrote: > Incidentally, if you deregister / are deregistered during a proposal's > voting period, can you still vote on it? I'm not sure offhand. Yes, Rules 1950 and 2156 both specify "entities that were ... players at the start of its voting period".

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Promotions

On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 20:18 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/5/5 Alex Smith : > > On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 00:52 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote: > >> I spend A C D to decrease Dvorak Herring's caste. > > > > Fails, those don't form a triad. (A minor triad, which you would need, > > is an interval of 3 sem

DIS: Proto-contest: Red November

Proto-contest: Red November 1. This is a public contract called Red November. This contract is intended to be a contest. The contestmaster CAN add the Y axis to and remove any other axis from this contract by announcement. 2. A contestant to this contract who is currently involved in an

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Promotions

2009/5/5 Alex Smith : > On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 00:52 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote: >> I spend A C D to decrease Dvorak Herring's caste. > > Fails, those don't form a triad. (A minor triad, which you would need, > is an interval of 3 semitones followed by an interval of 4 semitones. > What you have there i

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i register

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 14:00 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Alex Smith wrote: >> > All the time oklopol was registered, e didn't specify what eir email >> > address was (making my attempt to report on em as then-R

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i register

On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 14:00 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > > All the time oklopol was registered, e didn't specify what eir email > > address was (making my attempt to report on em as then-Registrar rather > > special-cased). We already have one

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i register

2009/5/5 Geoffrey Spear : > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Alex Smith wrote: >> All the time oklopol was registered, e didn't specify what eir email >> address was (making my attempt to report on em as then-Registrar rather >> special-cased). We already have one precedent of a player without an >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Pruning

On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 11:18 -0600, Sam Benner wrote: > I vote for this proposal. It hasn't been distributed yet; wait until the Promotor publishes a distribution of proposals, then you can vote on it. (It's more convenient voting on a distribution than on proposals when they're submitted, anyway.)

DIS: Re: BUS: [Auto] Subsidization

On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 11:34 -0500, comex wrote: > Each of the following requests subsidization. Disclaimer: Subsidization > requests fail if the Farmer has already requested subsidization this > week or if e owns at least as many lands as the Federal Subsidy. > * comex > * the AFO Or if e is seco

Re: DIS: Invasions and Terrible Proposals

On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 09:41 -0400, Sgeo wrote: > Suppose that, for some reason, a Terrible Proposal is on the ballot. A > large invasion force may join, say, a day before the Assessor is due > to asses the proposal, and vote FOR it. Unless 3 Senators are on > constant surveillance for such things,

DIS: Re: BUS: Promotions

On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 00:52 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote: > I spend A C D to decrease Dvorak Herring's caste. Fails, those don't form a triad. (A minor triad, which you would need, is an interval of 3 semitones followed by an interval of 4 semitones. What you have there is an interval of 3 semitones fol

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i register

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > All the time oklopol was registered, e didn't specify what eir email > address was (making my attempt to report on em as then-Registrar rather > special-cased). We already have one precedent of a player without an > independent email. (Also, the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i register

On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 03:40 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote: > On 2009-05-05, Quazie wrote: > > i am a separate person from quazie and i register at this e-mail > > address with a nickname of 'gwen.' > > > Not possible. You need an email. All the time oklopol was registered, e didn't specify what eir e

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Office Report

On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 20:12 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > Hmm. For me (because I guess my email client uses a non-fixed width > font by default), my reports look good and the root's report looks > bad. Different email clients use different fonts. A report that's lined up only for you is not reall

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Two ratification proposals

On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 00:30 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote: > 2009/5/4 Sean Hunt : > > I submit the following proposal, entitled {I Fone}, II=0 > > > > {{{ > > Create a new power-1 rule with the following text: > > > > If a public message claims to have been sent from a particular > > device o

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Pruning

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: > 2009/5/5 Sam Benner : >> I vote for this proposal. > > Fails for a few reasons: > > * You're not a player Yes e is.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Pruning

2009/5/5 Elliott Hird : > * You're not a player CoE: sorry, nope; you are

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Pruning

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Sam Benner wrote: > I vote for this proposal. nttpf. Also, it hasn't been distributed yet. Also, there's no reason for any lurkers to vote for it, since they can just make themselves active by announcement right after it passes if it does with the same effect.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Pruning

2009/5/5 Sam Benner : > I vote for this proposal. Fails for a few reasons: * You're not a player * You sent that to the discussion forum * That proposal has not been distributed yet

DIS: Re: BUS: Pruning

I vote for this proposal. On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: > I submit a proposal with AI=2 and II=1 entitled {You're All Dried Up} > and the following text: > > {{{ > For each player who did not submit a valid ballot on at least one Agoran > Decision in the month of May 2009, fl

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2482a assigned to root, Pavitra, Goethe, coppro, Wooble

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Benjamin Caplan wrote: > *  since precedence is not explicitly defined where there is no >   conflict, R217 defines it in that case. The text is silent, but if there's no conflict then there's no need for precedence to be defined and I'd rather see a judge assign

DIS: Re: BUS: [Auto] Subsidization

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:34 PM, comex wrote: > * the AFO Fails, not first-class

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2482a assigned to root, Pavitra, Goethe, coppro, Wooble

Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2482a >> >> �Appeal 2482a � > > I opine REASSIGN. Precedence is only defined where there is a > conflict

Re: DIS: Invasions and Terrible Proposals

2009/5/5 Sgeo : > Suppose that, for some reason, a Terrible Proposal is on the ballot. A > large invasion force may join, say, a day before the Assessor is due > to asses the proposal, and vote FOR it. Unless 3 Senators are on > constant surveillance for such things, it may be impossible to stop >

DIS: Re: BUS: Pruning

Sean Hunt wrote: > I submit a proposal with AI=2 and II=1 entitled {You're All Dried Up} > and the following text: > > {{{ > For each player who did not submit a valid ballot on at least one Agoran > Decision in the month of May 2009, flip that player's inactivity to > inactive. > > [Note: If you

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2436 assigned to Rodlen

2009/5/5 Rodlen : > I somehow end up with this one. Heh. > > Well, this is going to be tough. > > How does kicking Comex out of the PNP for a few months sound to you all? > > -- > --Rodlen > Unreasonable.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [AAA] Agriculture Report

2009/5/5 Geoffrey Spear : > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn > wrote: >> I harvest 2477 for Water Rights Vouchers. > > Fails, CFJ2477 was assigned its ID over a week ago (you're about 12 hours > late) > Oops. -- -Tiger

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [AAA] Agriculture Report

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > I harvest 2477 for Water Rights Vouchers. Fails, CFJ2477 was assigned its ID over a week ago (you're about 12 hours late)

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2477 assigned to Arnold Bros (est. 1905)

2009/5/5 Geoffrey Spear : > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Elliott Hird >> wrote: >>> I recuse myself. >>> ==  CFJ 2477  == >> >> I intend, without 2 objections, to set the II

Re: DIS: Invasions and Terrible Proposals

On Tue, 5 May 2009, Sgeo wrote: > Suppose that, for some reason, a Terrible Proposal is on the ballot. A > large invasion force may join, say, a day before the Assessor is due > to asses the proposal, and vote FOR it. Unless 3 Senators are on > constant surveillance for such things, it may be impo

DIS: Invasions and Terrible Proposals

Suppose that, for some reason, a Terrible Proposal is on the ballot. A large invasion force may join, say, a day before the Assessor is due to asses the proposal, and vote FOR it. Unless 3 Senators are on constant surveillance for such things, it may be impossible to stop the proposal being voted i

DIS: Re: BUS: Promotions

coppro wrote: > I spend A C D to decrease Dvorak Herring's caste. And what chord would that be, then?

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Office Report

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I'm having the same trouble when I use gmail in FRC.  Couldn't figure out > how to fix so I'd take pointers on that too if anyone has 'em.  For here, > it's often worth looking at how things look in the archives instead of > an email client, I t