On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Taral wrote:
> Given the above categorization, we can assemble these pieces into an
> injunction:
>
> For each month, for each contest, a player MAY NOT announce that e
> performed duties related to that contest in a timely manner during
> that month, unless permi
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> I think this is a pretty clear UNDECIDABLE. It's paradoxical whether
> Einos fulfils the conditions to still be a protectorate (it was once),
> and therefore whether it is currently a protectorate. The rules-defined
> action in the CFJ subject
2 matches
Mail list logo
