On 2009-03-17, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> 2009/3/17 Geoffrey Spear :
>>> I nominate myself as IADoP. I can't take this criminal sloppiness.
>>
>> I nominate Wooble for every office that I can.
>
> Oh, you are just going straight to hell, aren't you?
>
> I do
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Goethe wrote:
>
>> [2] Is a proposal distribution considered a Proposal Pool report?
>
> Proposal distributions have been routinely including the boilerplate
> text "Proposal pool: empty" (which counts) just before the text of
> the proposals being distribut
Goethe wrote:
> [2] Is a proposal distribution considered a Proposal Pool report?
Proposal distributions have been routinely including the boilerplate
text "Proposal pool: empty" (which counts) just before the text of
the proposals being distributed.
> [5] H. Ambassador, do you announce the comp
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> Office Holder Since Election II Priority Long Svc
>>> --
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, comex wrote:
> By the way, I'd appreciate if you would publish an IaDoP report so I
> don't have to go through all the elections to figure out who didn't do
> their duties.
Here is the list, I believe. Corrections invited, plus see questions [2], [5].
The only missed duties
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Office Holder SinceElection II Priority Long Svc
> ---
> Tailor Wooble 8 Feb 09 voting 1 low**
This line is incorrect; Wooble resigned the off
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> Amend Rule 2152 (Mother, May I?) by replacing the paragraph beginning:
>> 3. SHOULD NOT,
>> with:
>> 3. SHOULD NOT, DISCOURAGED, DEPRECATED: Performing the
>> described action without
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > The Anarchist is a low-priority office; its holder is responsible for
> > proposing the repeal of rules.
>
> Leaves weekly duties, so making it low-priority would have no
> appreciable effect.
>
Except the office wouldn't need to be fill
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> Guilty. I nominate Goethe and comex as Promotor.
>>
>> Yah, I do admit that's the problem; having recently picked up one
>> and possibly a second office, can't assimilate a third this month,
>> I regretfu
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Guilty. I nominate Goethe and comex as Promotor.
>
> Yah, I do admit that's the problem; having recently picked up one
> and possibly a second office, can't assimilate a third this month,
> I regretfully decline.
>
> -Goethe
By the way, I'd
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Amend Rule 2152 (Mother, May I?) by replacing the paragraph beginning:
> 3. SHOULD NOT,
> with:
> 3. SHOULD NOT, DISCOURAGED, DEPRECATED: Performing the
> described action without having and providing a very,
> very
> The Anarchist is a low-priority office; its holder is responsible for
> proposing the repeal of rules.
Leaves weekly duties, so making it low-priority would have no
appreciable effect.
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 16:02 -0700, Taral wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:42 PM, comex wrote:
> > I CFJ on the statement: { A rule was amended in the message in which
> > this CFJ was called. }
>
> Ugh. This is why I voted AGAINST.
>
I would have thought that the fact that it was a blatant sc
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I issue the Brokor's monthly and weekly reports:
>
> VP: coppro: 50
>
> Average VP over the last 90 days: All players: 0.
>
> Open Tickets: None.
>
pseudoCoE: the Vote Market is not a contract (it has only 1 party, and
doesn't identify itself a
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Taral wrote:
> I withdraw as many 9 crops as I can.
This should be 5 for 10 coins
> I transfer all my coins to Wooble.
2, I believe.
15 matches
Mail list logo
