On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, comex wrote:
>> I'm interpreting "player" using the R869 definition, but "continue to
>> play" using the ordinary-language definition.
>>
>> Arguably this is a bad idea.
>
> Fair enough, but how are you defining "deregister
comex wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:44 PM, comex wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> (unless that no longer happens
>>> with the new R106).
>> N.B. R106 was amended a few minutes after this was distributed.
>
> N.B. that's wrong, there are two voting results a
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:44 PM, comex wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> (unless that no longer happens
>> with the new R106).
>
> N.B. R106 was amended a few minutes after this was distributed.
N.B. that's wrong, there are two voting results and I confused them.
Mo
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> (unless that no longer happens
> with the new R106).
N.B. R106 was amended a few minutes after this was distributed.
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, comex wrote:
> I'm interpreting "player" using the R869 definition, but "continue to
> play" using the ordinary-language definition.
>
> Arguably this is a bad idea.
Fair enough, but how are you defining "deregister", which is the only
actual right?
The phrase "deregister
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> I hereby invoke my rule 101 right not to play the game.
>
> pesky contracts
You don't have that right because you're not a player (CFJ 1753).
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> I hereby invoke my rule 101 right to not participate in the game.
I request that the Distributor take steps to make sure the game stops
intruding on H. Fugitive ehird's mailbox.
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 2:32 PM, comex wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> I NoV against cmealerjr for violating the power-2 rule 2158 by failing
>> to assign a judgement to CFJ 2363 as soon as possible. (E's over 4 days
>> late, now, and appears to have disappeared fro
comex wrote:
> By the way, sorry for the late judgement:
>
> [13:21] comex: you're 39 years late to judge CFJ 2387
> [13:22] my guess is that Murphy's database accidentally
> thinks it was assigned to you at the epoch
Yeah, I copy+pasted the wrong thing into the Date Assigned field; I
caught a
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Hmm, there's an awful lot of contradictions in CFJs 1709, 1754, and
> your proto, surrounding the definition of "player". The word "player",
> *when used in R101*, can either means player in the R869 sense ("someone
> registered") or player in
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, comex wrote:
> According to that proto-judgement, you can still deregister normally
> if you want to stop being a player but continue to play, as R101
> creates a separate mechanism that must be invoked explicitly. People
> who deregistered but continued to play Werewolves, o
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Is there a reference for this? Don't remember it.
CFJs 1709 and 1753 are somewhat relevant.
> It seems that we've gone full circle from the days when we wanted non-
> players to be able to participate in contracts. In fact, there's
> prob
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> I hereby invoke my rule 101 right to not participate in the game.
It's not a right not to participate, its a right not to play. -G.
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, comex wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Proto-judgement: I am going to go against the judgement of CFJ 2380
> here. Indeed, as long as the Rules provide a specific mechanism for
> upholding a right, we should defer to that mechanism and not invent
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 2:31 PM, comex wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2387
>>
>> == CFJ 2387 ==
>>
>>Warrigal is a party to The Small Partial Mous
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2387
>
> == CFJ 2387 ==
>
>Warrigal is a party to The Small Partial Mousetrap.
>
> ===
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 23:41 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I move to REMAND each of these. I'm not sure whether the judge
> intended to agree with the defendant's late arguments or merely
> acknowledge that they have some weight, but in any case I believe
> e will give them due consideration in a re-ju
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 13:43 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Er, was mean to imply rounding to integer *after* setting the
> > multiplication level to any real between 1/2 and 2 and multiplying, so
> > a default Class 10 crime could be any integer between 5 an
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 17:27 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> I read through the AAA contract, and as I understand it it's just for
> me to join and request subsidization, and I will have a couple of
> lands to start with? Anything tricky I should think about?
Not in the AAA; the trickiest thing is
19 matches
Mail list logo
