Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Correction of Typos

2009-02-15 Thread Benjamin Caplan
Elliott Hird wrote: > On 2009-02-15, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> Please disregard any other versions of this proposal. >> > Not a sufficient formal retraction. ...although it might constitute an effective disclaimer of any subsequent version of the proposal e tries to submit. signature.asc Descri

Re: DIS: When were a-o and a-b made Public Fora?

2009-02-15 Thread Taral
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Sgeo wrote: > Were the agoranomic.org mailing lists running before than, just with no > records? Very much so. -- Taral "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2377 assigned to Wooble

2009-02-15 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I intend to appeal this judgement with 2 support. One thing missing > from this argument is the second paragraph of R106, which strongly > implies that a body of text with the right properties has to go > through a process to "become" a legal

DIS: When were a-o and a-b made Public Fora?

2009-02-15 Thread Sgeo
I don't see the required announcement to those fora made in Nov. 2002, when the first messages are recorded in the logs, but the Ruleset did have that requirement. http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2002-November/57.html Rule 478. Were the agoranomic.org mailing l

DIS: Re: BUS: (Attn Goethe) Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2382 assigned to woggle

2009-02-15 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> Thus, I hereby consent this CFJ to transfer this CFJ to H. Judge of >> CFJ 2380 Goethe (per R2164). > > I consent to the transfer. -Goethe This is ineffective, although you CAN transfer the case your yourself if you assign a judgment in th

DIS: reminder

2009-02-15 Thread Alexander Smith
There are some judicial requirements which are currently overdue; in fact, a few are getting to the point where in a few days the CotC will be late to recuse the judges responsible. This is just a reminder to judges to check ; it would be rather sad if