On Feb 5, 2009, at 3:28 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Proposal: That trick only works once
(AI = 2, please)
Amend Rule 2211 (The Grand Poobah) by inserting this text
before section b->c):
a->b) While there is more than one Alpha,
flip an Alpha's caste to Beta
I'm mildl
DRAFT - There's no reason to keep people in Savage longer than
necessary.
Amend R2211 by changing the sentence "At the beginning of each month,
each Alpha's caste is flipped to
eir default value." to read:
"At the beginning of each month, the caste of each Savage who was a
Savage fo
ais523 wrote:
> The AFO should notice that you aren't an eligible voter on them, just as
> it should notice that Wooble was only Beta not Alpha at the start of the
> voting period.
I did, but only because e voted before eir caste was increased. I need
to revise the database to retain a dated his
Tiger wrote:
> Ah. Then I don't think I'm an eligible voter for any of the proposals
> I have voted on. Should I say something in Business about this, or
> just leave it be and just see them not being counted?
The latter is fine; in practice, I've been controlling the AFO for the
purpose of count
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> Murphy wrote:
>> Tiger wrote:
>>
>>> I also vote FOR x2 the proposal in question.
>>>
>>> (If this message causes the proposal to become democrating, and so
>>> decreasing my voting limit to 1, the above papragraph is void and I
>>> instead vote FOR x1)
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 21:57 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> Murphy wrote:
> >Tiger wrote:
> >
> >> I also vote FOR x2 the proposal in question.
> >>
> >> (If this message causes the proposal to become democrating, and so
> >> decreasing my voting limit to 1, the above papragraph is void and I
> >>
Murphy wrote:
>Tiger wrote:
>
>> I also vote FOR x2 the proposal in question.
>>
>> (If this message causes the proposal to become democrating, and so
>> decreasing my voting limit to 1, the above papragraph is void and I
>> instead vote FOR x1)
>
>You're not an eligible voter for proposal 6072, as
Tiger wrote:
> I also vote FOR x2 the proposal in question.
>
> (If this message causes the proposal to become democrating, and so
> decreasing my voting limit to 1, the above papragraph is void and I
> instead vote FOR x1)
You're not an eligible voter for proposal 6072, as you weren't a player
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, comex wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to clean Rule 106 by replacing "than" by
> "then" in the paragraph:
Oh yes, nice try, I see what you're up to, first the proposal and now
here's the second piece, and using a new player for cover, too!
Clever loophole, though. I ob
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:49, Ed Murphy wrote:
[snip]
> Proposal: Patch 2321a
> (AI = 2, II = 0, please)
>
> Ratify the alleged history listed in these documents:
> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2321a
> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2321
Can we copy-and-p
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Charles Reiss wrote:
> Proposal: Isn't This What Patent Titles Are For?
No, it's not.
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 11:49 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Proposal: Patch 2321a
> (AI = 2, II = 0, please)
Ratification is secured at 3.
--
ais523
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Taral wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> I call for judgement on the statement "There is a rule with ID number
>> 2105.".
>
> I transfer 1 prop from myself to ais523 for this awesome CFJ.
By the way, as whitespace and capitalization and even punctua
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:10 AM, comex wrote:
> As opposed to repealing Rule 104.
Precisely.
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> This could just be me not being a native English speaker, but I think
> the form "If xxx, than yyy" is incorrect. It is found in two places in
> the rules, R106 and R2198, and should probably read "then" instead of
> "than". Since the Rulekeepor can change these typos, it'
This could just be me not being a native English speaker, but I think
the form "If xxx, than yyy" is incorrect. It is found in two places in
the rules, R106 and R2198, and should probably read "then" instead of
"than". Since the Rulekeepor can change these typos, it's not
necessary to submit propos
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, comex wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> unless, at some point in the past month, a power 2+ rule
>> contained the exact phrase "comex and ais523 were here".
>
> Proposal (AI=3)
> {
> Change the power of Rule 2238 to 3.
> Furthermore, amend it by
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>> Rule 2105 is an ASCII art picture (therefore not text)
>
> At least some ASCII art is also text, e.g.
> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1267
More random gratuity:
1. In many modern contexts ASCII *is* text (e.g. "text file
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 08:30 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Wooble wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >> Proposal: Five tons of flax
> >> (AI = 2, please)
> >>
> >> If the Tailor did not publish eir report during the voting period of
> >> the decision on whether to adopt t
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 08:27 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
> > Who says Murphy has to do all the work?
> >
> > The AFO publishes the following:
> > {{{
> > Registrar's Census
>
> Huh, I somehow missed that during my Tuesday catchup. Would you like to
> cover it on an ongoing basis?
Wooble wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Proposal: Five tons of flax
>> (AI = 2, please)
>>
>> If the Tailor did not publish eir report during the voting period of
>> the decision on whether to adopt this proposal, then repeal Rule
>> 2199 (Ribbons).
>
> The Tailor's
ais523 wrote:
> Who says Murphy has to do all the work?
>
> The AFO publishes the following:
> {{{
> Registrar's Census
Huh, I somehow missed that during my Tuesday catchup. Would you like to
cover it on an ongoing basis?
ais523 wrote:
> Rule 2105 is an ASCII art picture (therefore not text)
At least some ASCII art is also text, e.g.
http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1267
> that doesn't
> attempt to define, regulate, change or modify anything, even
> conditionally; so it doesn't seem to fit the de
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 07:58 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> If comex and ais523 have not yet won by dictatorship, comex
>> and ais523 are hereby each awarded Missed Congeniality.
> Note that I and the AFO almost certainly won by Dictatorship; the rule
> was cha
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 07:58 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> If comex and ais523 have not yet won by dictatorship, comex
> and ais523 are hereby each awarded Missed Congeniality.
Note that I and the AFO almost certainly won by Dictatorship; the rule
was changed to have the correct wording even if it wa
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decision to choose the
>>> holder of the Anarchist office. The eligible voters are the active
>>> players and the vote col
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> I submit the following proposal (AI=2, II=1, Title="FAQ"):
>
> Insert the following paragraph after the third paragraph of rule 2186:
> {{{
> When used as a period of time, a "game" is the period of time between
> one instant at which at le
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Proposal: Five tons of flax
> (AI = 2, please)
>
> If the Tailor did not publish eir report during the voting period of
> the decision on whether to adopt this proposal, then repeal Rule
> 2199 (Ribbons).
The Tailor's report is monthly and was a
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> Whatever happened to the Anarchist? As I understood it Bayes held it,
> but was declared inactive and lost it, the Goethe nominated himself
> for it. Has voting begun yet?
The nomination period ends Fri 6 Feb 15:50:49. Goethe is currently
On 5 Feb 2009, at 14:05, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
Whatever happened to the Anarchist? As I understood it Bayes held it,
but was declared inactive and lost it, the Goethe nominated himself
for it. Has voting begun yet?
I think Bayes is still Anarchist, officially.
Not that rutian runs a mail se
Whatever happened to the Anarchist? As I understood it Bayes held it,
but was declared inactive and lost it, the Goethe nominated himself
for it. Has voting begun yet?
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> I don't think it is possible to implicitly be a Win Announcement, they
> have to be 'clearly labeled'. (I generally use the phrasing "The
> following sentence is a Win Announcement, and this sentence serves to
> clearly label it as one.")
Actual
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Just a reminder to all Agorans, that this is Read the Ruleset Week.
> (Just pointing it out, because you need to actually read the ruleset to
> know when Read the Ruleset Week is...)
Let's take advantage of the week to find a power escalation th
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 14:46 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> I support.
>
> I also vote FOR x2 the proposal in question.
>
> (If this message causes the proposal to become democrating, and so
> decreasing my voting limit to 1, the above papragraph is void and I
> instead vote FOR x1)
Note that yo
Just a reminder to all Agorans, that this is Read the Ruleset Week.
(Just pointing it out, because you need to actually read the ruleset to
know when Read the Ruleset Week is...)
--
ais523
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 15:10 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Bah. This is a Win Announcement: I have enough points for a Win by
> High Score, and satisfy no Losing Conditions. (Disclaimer: if the
> previous message was a Win Announcement implicitly, then this one is
> ineffective because scores have a
36 matches
Mail list logo
