I wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2329
Body is correct, subject line is wrong.
Ffff
On 08/01/2009, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> This message serves to resolve the Agoran Decisions to choose the
>> holders of the Accountor and Anarchist offices. In each, the voters
>> were Wooble voting for Woob
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Sgeo wrote:
> I think we need to wait until the CFJs regarding recent win attempts
> are resolved.
ais523 is the Speaker unless eir earliest win attempts failed, and I'm
pretty sure eir MwoP was ratified by now. The only players who have
borne the title longer are
On Jan 7, 2009, at 2:16 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Crop/WRV Holdings
Player 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X WRV
OscarMeyr 0 8 2 0 24 11 1 4 15 1 7 6
PNP0 0 0 28 1 0 0 0
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 21:22 -0500, comex wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Charles Schaefer
>> wrote:
>> > Inquiry CFJ: {The current Speaker is Michael Norrish.}
>>
>> See CFJs 2155 and 1534.
>
> Someone told me that I'm the Speaker now.
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> I initiate an inquiry case on the following statement, disqualifying
>> Wooble:
>>
>> In the message quoted in caller's evidence, ehird acted on behalf
>> of Wooble to judge CFJ 2321.
>
>
> Gratuitou
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> For the record, I don't consider probing programs in legal BF to be
>> attacks... even with automated submissions. That's part of the fun.
>> I'd frown on XSS or directory hunting etc. though I thin
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> For the record, I don't consider probing programs in legal BF to be
> attacks... even with automated submissions. That's part of the fun.
> I'd frown on XSS or directory hunting etc. though I think the setup
> is pretty ok there.
I'm mostly an
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> This is an awful judgement. Then again, I don't think your Servant
>> Coin was ever removed, so...
>
> Why? I'm biased, and one can always go into excessive detail in a judgement,
> but the caller's arguments were generally clear enough that
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Elliott Hird
> wrote:
>> On 7 Jan 2009, at 17:00, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> I formally request that the Servant write a judgment for this CFJ.
>> My judgment: I accept the caller's arguments. TRUE.
>
> This is an awful judgement.
On 7 Jan 2009, at 18:27, comex wrote:
Then again, I don't think your Servant Coin was ever removed, so...
It's w3o.
AAA Non-Secretary's non-report
Crop/WRV Holdings
Player 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X WRV
0x44 0 0 0 6 0 7 1 0 1 0 0 2
AFO 41 35 1 0 3 0 3 41 11 31 5 0
ais52
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> On 7 Jan 2009, at 17:00, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I formally request that the Servant write a judgment for this CFJ.
> My judgment: I accept the caller's arguments. TRUE.
This is an awful judgement. Then again, I don't think your Servant
Coi
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I transfer a prop from comex to Goethe for using the joust test server
> to reverse engineer scripts by flooding the server with test programs.
I love side-channel attacks.
wooble_231208_2:
Minimum runtime before win: 429
0: 128 1: 255
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Taral wrote:
> I disapprove this motion for being insufficiently specific. I have my
> doubts as to its validity to begin with.
How specific could it be? By the time it's resolved, the PBA's rates
and holdings will almost certainly have changed.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:45 PM, The PerlNomic Partnership
wrote:
> The PNP withdraws one 3 crop from the PBA for ^14.
> The PNP withdraws one 7 crop from the PBA for ^14.
> Using a Division Mill, the PNP mills 3 / 7 = 2.
> The PNP deposits one 2 crop into the PBA to gain ^33.
> The PNP withdraws
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> I PBA-withdraw as many A Credits as possible.
> I PBA-withdraw as many A# Credits as possible.
> I PBA-withdraw as many B Credits as possible.
> I PBA-withdraw as many C Credits as possible.
> I PBA-withdraw as many C# Credits as possible.
> I PB
On 7 Jan 2009, at 03:11, comex wrote:
I intend, with the unanimous consent of the current Partners of the
AFO, to admit ais523 to it.
Can I get in on the fun?
No?
Aw.
18 matches
Mail list logo
