Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Werewolves session #3 update

2008-12-14 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Jamie Dallaire wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> >> The Lovers have been chosen and informed. The first day phase >> hereby begins. > > So... Any inactives we should get rid of? avpx and Quazie, definitely. Zefram is inactive but s

DIS: Re: BUS: Werewolves session #3 update

2008-12-14 Thread Jamie Dallaire
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > The Lovers have been chosen and informed. The first day phase > hereby begins. > So... Any inactives we should get rid of?

Re: DIS: A new potential protectorate for you!

2008-12-14 Thread Elliott Hird
On 15/12/2008, comex wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Craig Daniel wrote: >> The Curvature of the Earth is Overwhelmed by Local Noise >> Nomic > > Hmm, looks like HRC isn't new to the world of Nomic... this is from > ceolnn around 2000: > { > Shortly afterward, the following Move was App

Re: DIS: A new potential protectorate for you!

2008-12-14 Thread comex
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Craig Daniel wrote: > The Curvature of the Earth is Overwhelmed by Local Noise > Nomic Hmm, looks like HRC isn't new to the world of Nomic... this is from ceolnn around 2000: { Shortly afterward, the following Move was Applied: proposal = Add a new rule after

DIS: A new potential protectorate for you!

2008-12-14 Thread Craig Daniel
Agorans, I recently started (and mentioned on the IRC channel) a sort of revived The Curvature of the Earth is Overwhelmed by Local Noise Nomic, entitled The Earth is Nonetheless an Oblate Spheroid Nomic; it may be found at http://einos-nomic.blogspot.com/ The Earth is Nonetheless an Oblate Spher

DIS: Re: BUS: Initiation of Werewolves session #3

2008-12-14 Thread Jamie Dallaire
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > There are 13 townspersons (root, Zefram, ais523, ehird, avpx, comex, > Quazie, 0x44, Charles, Warrigal, Billy Pilgrim, Elysion, and Sgeo), > of which 3 will be selected as werewolves. I don't think any of the townspersons are exclusively playe

Re: DIS: Unbought votes are boring

2008-12-14 Thread comex
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Here's an idea to encourage more votes to be bought, will turn it over > to the economic automation mavens for possible implementation: > > Create a Bayes-type partnership that, if a vote is put on sale within > the first three days of a proposa

Re: DIS: Unbought votes are boring

2008-12-14 Thread Elliott Hird
On 14 Dec 2008, at 15:34, Ed Murphy wrote: > Alternatively, just have it cast its own votes in weighted proportion > to bribes transferred to it for no other purpose. the Sheeple

DIS: Unbought votes are boring

2008-12-14 Thread Ed Murphy
Here's an idea to encourage more votes to be bought, will turn it over to the economic automation mavens for possible implementation: Create a Bayes-type partnership that, if a vote is put on sale within the first three days of a proposal's voting period but not bought by someone else within the f

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 6018-6026

2008-12-14 Thread Ed Murphy
ehird wrote: > On 14 Dec 2008, at 08:42, Ed Murphy wrote: > >> You can always propose undoing the changes you don't like; it'll >> probably vote for that, too. >> > > When was the last time bayes voted AGAINST? :P # select number from votes # where voter = (select id from players where name = '

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 6018-6026

2008-12-14 Thread Elliott Hird
On 14 Dec 2008, at 08:42, Ed Murphy wrote: > You can always propose undoing the changes you don't like; it'll > probably vote for that, too. > When was the last time bayes voted AGAINST? :P

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 6018-6026

2008-12-14 Thread Ed Murphy
comex wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Bayes wrote: >>> 6026 O 1 1.0 Murphy Cleanup of Power=1 definitions >> FOR*8 (98% sure) > > S'pose I should have left Bayes broken. :/ You can always propose undoing the changes you don't like; it'll probably vote for that, too.