On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [lots of deep reasoning]
>
> My assumption was "it will take about 2 minutes to write a perl script
> to brute force this."
Ditto, except I used py
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you want to read CFJ 1966 before continuing this conversation? Agora
> took a long time to get to Judge Wooble's final decision, so it's not one
> to be discarded lightly. (Sorry I didn't mention the number earlier, I'd
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:10 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last week there was one puzzle submitted for Enigma, by ais523; I hereby
> list that puzzle, and start its answer submission period. Hopefully it
> won't be as buggy as last week's! (I think it's also a bit more
> difficult, but h
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:51 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I fill this ticket, specifying AGAINST.
> Hmm... would you bribe me to vote on 5709 too?
> I retract my votes on 5709 and vote SELL (2VP - Endorse Murphy) on 5709.
Sorry, no can do. The 25 VP I have left are all going toward Pa
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 5709 D 1 2.0 Murphy Form 2126-EZ
>> AGAINST. Sell Ticket 2VP vote as specified.
>
> I fill this ticket, specifying AGAINST.
I hereby...er, right.
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 08:45 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 19:03 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> In any case. I vote on the proposal in question:
> >> 4xAGAINST. I issue a sell ticket 2VP vote as directed.
> > I fill that ticket, directing Goethe to change eir
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> There's nothing that says privileges can't grant ability in general.
>> There's nothing that says they can.
>
> So? There's also nothing that says the privilege of doing what thou
>
ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 19:03 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> In any case. I vote on the proposal in question:
>> 4xAGAINST. I issue a sell ticket 2VP vote as directed.
> I fill that ticket, directing Goethe to change eir vote on proposal 5707
> to FORx4.
The difference between secti
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 11:40 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:29 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmm... interesting. But given that I have to award myself "as many
> > points as possible" later on, would that give me infinite points?
>
> Well, it's not possible to
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:29 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm... interesting. But given that I have to award myself "as many
> points as possible" later on, would that give me infinite points?
Well, it's not possible to award more points than the limit, so you
wouldn't be required to a
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [lots of deep reasoning]
My assumption was "it will take about 2 minutes to write a perl script
to brute force this."
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 09:27 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:05 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I attempt to award 4 points to ais523 for authoring the puzzle. This
> > fails because a contestmaster can't award points to emself, but I have
> > to try.
>
> It wouldn't
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:05 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I attempt to award 4 points to ais523 for authoring the puzzle. This
> fails because a contestmaster can't award points to emself, but I have
> to try.
It wouldn't if Enigma were a member contract of the PRS.
BobTHJ
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 09:18 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yer just in it for the deputization...
>
> No, I'm just opposed to officers blatantly abusing their powers.
You don't want to see what me blatantly abusing Mad
On 29 Sep 2008, at 14:18, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
No, I'm just opposed to officers blatantly abusing their powers.
The power is a blatant abuse in the first place.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yer just in it for the deputization...
No, I'm just opposed to officers blatantly abusing their powers.
On 29 Sep 2008, at 13:32, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I nominate Wooble as Mad Scientist.
Yer just in it for the deputization...
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's nothing that says privileges can't grant ability in general.
CFJ 1966 says it, and it hasn't been overturned legislatively or by
another precedent yet.
On 29 Sep 2008, at 02:27, Ed Murphy wrote:
I tried replacing this:
with this:
max="10">
max="10">
and it generated two pairs of buttons, but one pair was the wrong
size,
and they both affected the same input control.
Ah. Oh dear. I probably should have tested multiple controls. :-)
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There's nothing that says privileges can't grant ability in general.
> There's nothing that says they can.
So? There's also nothing that says the privilege of doing what thou
wilt guarantees anything whatsoever. We accept
20 matches
Mail list logo
