On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Ben Caplan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Under your style of parsing, a sentence like
>> Points are a currency. (R2179)
>> would be interpreted as "'Points' is defined to mean a currency."
>
> No, this sentence is more ana
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ooh, a classic faulty syllogism:
> 1. A person is an entity that is the subject of rights and
>obligations under the rules.
> 2. The monster is an entity that is the subject of rights
>(nb. not really) and obligatio
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Under your style of parsing, a sentence like
> Points are a currency. (R2179)
> would be interpreted as "'Points' is defined to mean a currency."
No, this sentence is more analogous:
A point is an entity that is a cu
> > > {{{
> > > A person is an entity that has the general capacity to be
> > > the subject of rights and obligations under the rules. }}}
>
> I read the sentence as "A
> person is hereby defined to be an entity that has the general
> capacity to be the subject of rights and obligations under
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 14:39 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, ais523 wrote:
> > I call for judgement on the statement "The Monster is a person".
> >
> > Evidence:
> > Rule 2150:
> > {{{
> > A person is an entity that has the general capacity to be the
> > subject of rights
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, ais523 wrote:
> I call for judgement on the statement "The Monster is a person".
>
> Evidence:
> Rule 2150:
> {{{
> A person is an entity that has the general capacity to be the
> subject of rights and obligations under the rules.
> }}}
Ooh, a classic faulty syllogi
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:17 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the purposes of this message, Mr. Elbow is defined as an entity I
> can act on behalf of by announcement.
Then Mr. Elbow must be yourself, since I am not aware of any other
entities you can act on behalf of by announcement.
-- Forwarded message --
From: The Monster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:58 AM
Subject: [s-b] Operantly Conditioned Beast, are you there?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello. Sorry for sending this so publically and all, but I've been
trying to find your email
address f
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 4:52 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> require a detailed knowledge of how it works.) As non-Agorans are not
>> even necessarily subscribed to a public forum, it seems quite possible
>> that a non-Agoran could join an Agor
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I harvest 2159, 2160, 2163, and 2164, the ID numbers assigned to CFJs
> in the past week, using four X crops as three 6s and one 5, to gain 8
> WRVs.
>
Fails, timing (as you pointed out)
> I transfer Zanzibar and 1 WRV t
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 23:50 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 6:34 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I still have a strong feeling that Agora needs some sort of safety valve
> >> to escape from situat
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 20:16 -0500, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> I humbly request for a list of those obligations of mine that are public.
With respect to contracts, your obligations are to ensure that the AFO
obeys the Rules of Agora to the maximum possible extent, ensure that the
Left Hand obeys the
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 4:52 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> require a detailed knowledge of how it works.) As non-Agorans are not
> even necessarily subscribed to a public forum, it seems quite possible
> that a non-Agoran could join an Agoran contract yet be unaware of the
> equity system
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 18:05 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> > 2008/9/21 Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Do I have to do anything now to take care of crimes I committed back then?
> >
> > To the best of my knowledge, you are a free man.
>
>
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 20:10 -0400, ihope wrote:
> The proposal system's 12 (actually higher than 12, of course) gets
> bigger whenever 26 gets bigger. A with-support rule's 12 does not.
I challenge that "actually higher"; barring vetos, I believe that a team
of 11 Scamsters working together could c
15 matches
Mail list logo
