Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Grand Poobah] Caste Report

Goethe wrote: > In this case, all demotions failed, as BobTHJ would have had to demote > a Beta first. (I think once you do skip a step, everything after that is > platonically blocked because the CAN implied with the SHALL is pegged > to doing things in order, if you do it out of order, you n

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Grand Poobah] Caste Report

On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> GAMMA (Voting Limit: 3) >> Wooble > > CoE: I increased my caste to Beta in the message with ID > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In this case, all demotions failed, as BobTHJ would have ha

Re: DIS: Contestmaster Awards

2008/8/18 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > BobTHJ wrote: > >> If you have served as the contestmaster of a contest during the months >> of June or July and have fulfilled all your obligations under that >> contest please post (to a public forum) a statement that you have done >> so, along with the

DIS: Re: BUS: Poobah Caste Shuffle

On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Roger Hicks wrote: >> As required, I adjust player castes for the month of August as follows: >> >> Promoted to Alpha: Taral >> Promoted to Beta: BobTHJ >> Promoted to Gamma: Quazie >> Promoted to Delta: Ivan Hope >> >> Demoted to Delt

DIS: Re: BUS: paradox CFJ

2008/8/18 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I intend, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal CFJ alleging that > tusho violated Rule 2110 by failing to make a reasonable attempt to > resolve the paradox by which e won as soon as possible after winning > by paradox. > > --Wooble > I talked with

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5673-5673

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 15:10, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 14:07 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: >> ais523 wrote: >> >> > On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 15:38 -0700, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote: >> >> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE >> > I vote as follows >> >> 5673 D 2 3.1

Re: DIS: Contestmaster Awards

On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 14:12 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > BobTHJ wrote: > > > If you have served as the contestmaster of a contest during the months > > of June or July and have fulfilled all your obligations under that > > contest please post (to a public forum) a statement that you have done > > so,

Re: DIS: Contestmaster Awards

BobTHJ wrote: > If you have served as the contestmaster of a contest during the months > of June or July and have fulfilled all your obligations under that > contest please post (to a public forum) a statement that you have done > so, along with the number of contestants in that contest for each o

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5673-5673

On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 14:07 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > ais523 wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 15:38 -0700, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote: > >> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE > > I vote as follows > >> 5673 D 2 3.1 fds test > > FORx1 (it's Democratic). > > Since the PNP

DIS: Re: BUS: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5673-5673

ais523 wrote: > On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 15:38 -0700, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote: >> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE > I vote as follows >> 5673 D 2 3.1 fds test > FORx1 (it's Democratic). Since the PNP is not Promotor, the alleged distribution did not distribute that pro

Re: ?spam? BUS: Re: DIS: Contestmaster Awards

On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 21:21 +0100, ais523 wrote: > On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 14:05 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: > > If you have served as the contestmaster of a contest during the months > > of June or July and have fulfilled all your obligations under that > > contest please post (to a public forum) a st

DIS: Contestmaster Awards

If you have served as the contestmaster of a contest during the months of June or July and have fulfilled all your obligations under that contest please post (to a public forum) a statement that you have done so, along with the number of contestants in that contest for each of those months. Thanks

DIS: Proto: [Scorekeepor] Scoreboard

Scorekeepor's Scoreboard Time of last report: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 Time of this report: (All times are in UTC. Precision in timing not guaranteed.) Player Score ais52340 BobTHJ12 comex 2 Eris 1 Iammars 62 Murphy28 OscarMeyr 2

DIS: Registrar Report online

I've put the registrar-report-in-progress online at . (tusho hasn't made an HTML version of this yet, but knowing em it's only a matter of time.) For protection against email harvesting it uses = rather than @ in email addresses. I would put the Mad Scien

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2115 judged UNDECIDABLE by woggle

On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 23:35 -0400, comex wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Judge woggle's Arguments: > > > > I judge UNDECIDABLE. See also the precedent of CFJ 1787. >

DIS: Re: BUS: reregistering

On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 10:28 -0500, Chester Mealer wrote: > I resume being cdm014. If the previous statement was not a possible > action, I register or reregister under the name cdm014 choosing the > action which best communicates that I was previously an active player > called cdm014 and wish to be

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [IADOP] Rulekeepor election

pikhq wrote: > If Zefram is active by the time this election is resolved, I vote > zefram. Otherwise, I vote comex. NttPF.

DIS: Re: OFF: [IADOP] Rulekeepor election

On 21:14 Wed 13 Aug , Geoffrey Spear wrote: > This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decision to choose the > holder of the Rulekeepor position. The eligible voters are the active > players and the vote collector is the IADOP. > > The valid options are zefram (who is inactive), Wooble, an

DIS: Re: BUS: paradox CFJ

On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 09:01 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > I intend, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal CFJ alleging that > tusho violated Rule 2110 by failing to make a reasonable attempt to > resolve the paradox by which e won as soon as possible after winning > by paradox. > > --Wooble It

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Suggestion: Use the existing mechanism in rule 2198

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:18 AM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you include the header and >s as part of the proposal or don't > enter its adoption index as 1.5, I will bite you. It's fairly likely that the PNP will be the Promotor soon, so you'll be able to bite yourself.

DIS: Re: BUS: Banking, Farming, and RBoA amendment

On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I withdraw an 8 crop for 98 chits. (I should have 50 now.) > > I deposit a 5 crop for 77 chits. (I should have 137 now.) Bad math here. > > I deposit 3 0 crops for 120 chits. (197 now.) and here. > > > If I calculated thi